ArticleIrish journal of medical science2019
An audit of discharge summaries from secondary to primary care.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis decoded: a taxonomy and natural language processing analysis of the diagnosis section in German hospital discharge summaries.Health care management science · 2025Article
- One template does not fit all: where next to improve hospital discharge communication to primary care?Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Healthcare professional perspectives on medication challenges in the post-stroke patient.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Waste Related to the Admission Process of Low-Complexity Patients in Emergency Services, in Light of the Lean Healthcare Philosophy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Evaluation and perceptions of a nursing discharge plan among nurses from different healthcare settings in Spain.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- "It's Difficult, There's No Formula": Qualitative Study of Stroke Related Communication Between Primary and Secondary Healthcare Professionals.International journal of integrated care · 2020Article
- Improving continuity of care of patients with respiratory disease at hospital discharge.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2020Article
- Response to: an audit of discharge summaries from secondary to primary care.Irish journal of medical science · 2020Article
- The Patient-Held Active Record of Medication Status (PHARMS) study: a mixed-methods feasibility analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth is information-intensive. Reliable health care depends on access to this information in a timely and accurate manner. A standardised data set for clinical discharge summaries is essential to optimise the care the patient receives, particularly at discharge. The Irish Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) have recently developed a national standard for patient discharge summaries.
aimsOur aim was to assess the current quality of discharge summaries being received, determine the main areas of concern and establish the areas to improve patient safety.
methodsWe studied 60 discharge summaries received at 3 general practices in the Mid-West of Ireland. We used HIQA "National Standard for Patient Discharge Summary" 2013 as our audit standard.
resultsMandatory fields including Surname, Forename and date of birth were present in 100%, missing in 0%. The patient's address was missing in 7% (n = 4). Gender was missing in 82% (n = 50). Source of referral was missing in 52% (n = 32). No method of admission was documented in 70% (n = 43). Whilst principal diagnosis was documented in 100% (n = 60), no co-morbidities were documented in 28% (n = 17). No medication was documented in 30% (n = 18), and there was no documentation of medication changed in 39% (n = 24). Details of the person completing the discharge summary were incomplete as follows: 85% (n = 52) had no specialty documentation, 36% (n = 22) had no registration number and 38% (n = 23) had no contact number.
conclusionsThis audit shows deficits in adhering to HIQA standards. These must be addressed as a matter of urgency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30019095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.