Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30019072›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

No difference in sensory outcome between vertical and oblique incisions for hamstring graft harvest during ACL reconstruction.

Mohamed M F Sharaby, Arafat Alfikey, Ismail S Alhabsi, Suwailim Al-Ghannami

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lower donor-site morbidity using QT autografts for ACL reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Observational
  8. Gracilis tendon harvest may lead to both incisional and non-incisional saphenous nerve injuries.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed M F SharabyMansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt. sharaby_mmf@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-7357
Arafat AlfikeyKhoula Hospital, Mina alfahl, Muscat, Oman.
Ismail S AlhabsiKhoula Hospital, Mina alfahl, Muscat, Oman.
Suwailim Al-GhannamiKhoula Hospital, Mina alfahl, Muscat, Oman.
Khoula Hospital · OMMansoura University Hospital · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the incidence, extent of sensory loss, its clinical effect and natural course caused by sensory nerve injury, during two different skin incisions used for autogenous hamstring graft harvest during ACL reconstruction.

methodsThis randomized prospective study was carried out on 84 patients, divided into two groups, all of them underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with two incisions; a vertical incision used in 43 patients, and an oblique incision in 41 patients. The location and area of sensory loss were evaluated during follow-up as well as the degree of improvement and patient satisfaction.

resultsThe average age in this study was 29.8 ± 7.2 in the vertical group and 29.9 ± 6.3 in the oblique group. Both semitendinosus and gracilles were harvested in 34 patients, semitendinosus in 49 patients and gracilles in one patient. In the vertical group, a higher incidence of sensory loss was recorded with 21 patients (51.2%), relative to the oblique group with 18 patients (41.9%). However, there was no statistically significant difference (p = n.s). Most of the sensory loss affected the distribution of the IPBSN (infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve) in 27 patients (69.2%) in both groups, and to a lesser extent in the lower medial area [distribution of SBSN (sartorial branch of saphenous nerve)] in 12 patients (30.8%).

conclusionThis study clearly revealed the high incidence of nerve injury particularly the IPBSN during hamstring graft harvest, but did not prove a difference between oblique and vertical incisions, with regard to postoperative sensory loss. It was clear that harvesting the semitendinosus alone is not a factor that can diminish nerve injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

AdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHamstring TendonsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTissue and Organ HarvestingTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeACL reconstructionHamstring graftOblique incisionSaphenous nerve injuryVertical incision

Identifiers

PMID30019072
OpenAlexW2883390267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.