Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30019016›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2018

Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs.

Karin Thursky, Senthil Lingaratnam, Jasveer Jayarajan, Gabrielle M Haeusler, Benjamin Teh, Michelle Tew, Georgina Venn, Alison Hiong, Christine Brown, Vivian Leung and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Letter in reply to Carboni F et al.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karin ThurskyNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-232X
Senthil LingaratnamDepartment of Pharmacy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jasveer JayarajanDepartment of General Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gabrielle M HaeuslerNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Benjamin TehNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle TewNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Georgina VennDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alison HiongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christine BrownDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vivian LeungDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Leon J WorthNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kim DalzielCenter for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monica A SlavinNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection and sepsis are common problems in cancer management affecting up to 45% of patients and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilisation.

objectiveTo develop and implement a whole of hospital clinical pathway for the management of sepsis (SP) in a specialised cancer hospital and to measure the impact on patient outcomes and healthcare utilisation.

methodsA multidisciplinary sepsis working party was established. Process mapping of practices for recognition and management of sepsis was undertaken across all clinical areas. A clinical pathway document that supported nurse-initiated sepsis care, prompt antibiotic and fluid resuscitation was implemented. Process and outcome measures for patients with sepsis were collected preimplementation (April-December 2012), postimplementation cohorts (April-December 2013), and from January to December 2014.

results323 patients were evaluated (111 preimplementation, 212 postimplementation). More patients with sepsis had lactate measured (75.0% vs 17.2%) and appropriate first dose antibiotic (90.1% vs 76.1%) (all p<0.05). Time to antibiotics was halved (55 vs 110 min, p<0.05). Patients with sepsis had lower rates of intensive care unit admission (17.1% vs 35.5%), postsepsis length of stay (7.5 vs 9.9 days), and sepsis-related mortality (5.0% vs 16.2%) (all p<0.05). Mean total hospital admission costs were lower in the SP cohort, with a significant difference in admission costs between historical and SP non-surgical groups of $A8363 (95% CI 81.02 to 16645.32, p=0.048) per patient on the pathway. A second cohort of 449 patients with sepsis from January to December 2014 demonstrated sustained improvement.

conclusionsThe SP was associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes and reduced costs. The SP has been sustained since 2013, and has been successfully implemented in another hospital with further implementations underway in Victoria.

Indexed as

antibiotic managementhealth services researchnursesprocess mappingquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID30019016
PMCPMC6045757
OpenAlexW2837150463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.