ArticleIMA fungus2018
Sequence-based nomenclature: a reply to Thines
Article in IMA fungus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dirt or type? Clarifying fungal nomenclature in the DNA age.IMA fungus · 2026Article
- Article
- Call me by your name: Considerations of DNA sequences as types within wider discussions on fungal nomenclature.Mycology · 2024Review
- Does One Size Fit All? Variations in the DNA Barcode Gaps of Macrofungal Genera.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- How, not if, is the question mycologists should be asking about DNA-based typification.MycoKeys · 2023Article
- Fungal biodiversity and conservation mycology in light of new technology, big data, and changing attitudes.Current biology : CB · 2021Review
- Phylogeny, Global Biogeography and Pleomorphism ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- A multigene phylogeny toward a new phylogenetic classification ofIMA fungus · 2019Article
- Current insights into fungal species diversity and perspective on naming the environmental DNA sequences of fungi.Mycology · 2019Review
- A new species ofMycoKeys · 2019Article
- Sequence-based nomenclature: a reply to ThinesIMA fungus · 2018Article
- Considerations and consequences of allowing DNA sequence data as types of fungal taxa.IMA fungus · 2018Article
- Great differences in performance and outcome of high-throughput sequencing data analysis platforms for fungal metabarcoding.MycoKeys · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We reply to two recently published, multi-authored opinion papers by opponents of sequence-based nomenclature, namely Zamora
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.