ArticleIMA fungus2018
Panama, a hot spot for
Article in IMA fungus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Production of bioactive spirodioxynaphthalenes from Hermatomyces reticulatus (Pleosporales).Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Palm Fungi and Their Key Role in Biodiversity Surveys: A Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Studies of Saprobic Fungi Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Morphological and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses reveal five new hyphomycetes from freshwater habitats.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Why morphology matters: the negative consequences of hasty descriptions of putative novelties in asexual ascomycetes.IMA fungus · 2021Article
- Fungal diversity notes 1387-1511: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa.Fungal diversity · 2021Article
- Novel saprobicMycoKeys · 2021Article
- Mapping mycological ignorance - checklists and diversity patterns of fungi known for West Africa.IMA fungus · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Five new species belonging to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.