ArticleIMA fungus2018
NGS barcode sequencing in taxonomy and diagnostics, an application in "
Article in IMA fungus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- LAMP-Based Detection ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Article
- Comparison of QIIME1 and QIIME2 for Analyzing Fungal Samples from Various Built Environments.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Targeted sequencing analysis pipeline for species identification of human pathogenic fungi using long-read nanopore sequencing.IMA fungus · 2023Article
- MinION Sequencing of Yeast Mock Communities To Assess the Effect of Databases and ITS-LSU Markers on the Reliability of Metabarcoding Analysis.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing Applications for the Study of Fungal Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Using High-Throughput Amplicon Sequencing to Evaluate Intragenomic Variation and Accuracy in Species Identification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- DNA barcoding of phytopathogens for disease diagnostics and bio-surveillance.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Review
- Single Strain High-Depth NGS Reveals High rDNA (ITS-LSU) Variability in the Four Prevalent Pathogenic Species of the GenusMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- What Is the Best Lens? Comparing the Resolution Power of Genome-Derived Markers and Standard Barcodes.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Homoplasy as an Auxiliary Criterion for Species Delimitation.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?IMA fungus · 2020Article
- High-Throughput Rapid and Inexpensive Assay for Quantitative Determination of Low Cell-Density Yeast Cultures.Microorganisms · 2019Article
- Sequence-based nomenclature: a reply to ThinesIMA fungus · 2018Article
- Early Ongoing Speciation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species identification of yeasts and other Fungi is currently carried out with Sanger sequences of selected molecular markers, mainly from the ribosomal DNA operon, characterized by hundreds of tandem repeats of the 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and LSU
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.