ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2018
Endovascular treatment for hemorrhagic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: experience with 9 cases for 3 years.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombolysis in patients with acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Pooled it
- Post-partum cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A case report.Qatar medical journal · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors for in-hospital death due to cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in three medical centers over a 10-year period.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vein and Venous Sinus Thrombosis-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with severe cerebral venous thrombosis: A meta-analysis.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2022Article
- Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy with a Large-Bore Aspiration Catheter and Stent Retriever for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Pregnancy: A Case Report.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Stent Thrombectomy Alone or Combined With Intermediate Catheter Aspiration for Severe Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case-Series.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Multimodal Regional Brain Monitoring of Tissue Ischemia in Severe Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.Neurocritical care · 2019Article
- Endovascular Treatment for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: Comparison among Different Endovascular Procedures.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWe experienced a series of patients with hemorrhagic CVST, who were successfully treated with endovascular treatment (EVT). The aim was to explore the best scheme for the future through our treatment data of hemorrhagic CVST. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted, selecting nine hemorrhagic CVST patients, who were mainly treated with EVT. Characteristics of hemorrhagic CVST were recorded, including risk factors, thrombus location, presenting symptoms, and treatment details included type of EVT. We also recorded clinical outcomes, degree of sinus recanalization, thrombus recurrences, periprocedural complications, degree of neurological deficit at last follow-up.
resultsCatheter thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy were applied in all of the nine hemorrhagic CVST patients, stent retriever was used in 7 patients, one of them combined with balloon-assisted thrombectomy. Besides EVT, two patients accepted emergency surgical decompression, one in the local hospital, and the other in our hospital. The follow-up duration ranged from 4 to 28 months. All of them have a neurological and symptomatic improvement, 6 patients have a good outcome, the rest 3 patients have a poor outcome, no thrombus recurrences and death in them. Seven patients had complete recanalization and two patients had partial recanalization at last follow-up.
conclusionEVT is an effective and safe procedure for potentially catastrophic hemorrhagic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30018704PMC6038069W2966866384What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.