Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30018636›Full record

ArticleDermatology research and practice2018

The Antibacterial Effect

Reem Dina Matzen, Julie Zinck Leth-Espensen, Therese Jansson, Dennis Sandris Nielsen, Marianne N Lund, Steen Matzen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Bioactive Value ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. BioMed research international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reem Dina MatzenDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-3370
Julie Zinck Leth-EspensenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Therese JanssonDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dennis Sandris NielsenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8121-1114
Marianne N LundDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steen MatzenDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-3846
University of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanism behind the biologic actions of honey as a wound remedy has been intensively studied; however, there is no published data regarding any antibacterial effect of honey derived from Danish flora. We surveyed 11 honeys of various Danish floral sources for their antibacterial activity and compared them to a culinary processed commercial honey (Jakobsens) and a raw and a medical grade Manuka (

Identifiers

PMID30018636
PMCPMC6029468
OpenAlexW2809436271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.