Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30018564›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018

Engineered Flock House Virus for Targeted Gene Suppression Through RNAi in Fruit Flies (

Clauvis N T Taning, Olivier Christiaens, XiuXia Li, Luc Swevers, Hans Casteels, Martine Maes, Guy Smagghe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. RNAi Crop Protection Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Use of Engineered Plant Viruses in aFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Clauvis N T TaningDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Olivier ChristiaensDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
XiuXia LiDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Luc SweversInsect Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology Research Group, Institute of Biosciences & Applications, NCSR "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
Hans CasteelsCrop Protection, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium.
Martine MaesCrop Protection, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium.
Guy SmaggheDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BENational Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful tool to study functional genomics in insects and the potential of using RNAi to suppress crop pests has made outstanding progress. However, the delivery of dsRNA is a challenging step in the development of RNAi bioassays. In this study, we investigated the ability of engineered Flock House virus (FHV) to induce targeted gene suppression through RNAi under

Indexed as

double stranded RNADrosophila melanogasterFlock House virusRNAiS2 cellsvirus-induced gene silencing

Identifiers

PMID30018564
PMCPMC6037854
OpenAlexW2808455106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.