Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30018514›Full record

ReviewRadiology and oncology2018

Radiotherapy of Glioblastoma 15 Years after the Landmark Stupp's Trial: More Controversies than Standards?

Tomas Kazda, Adam Dziacky, Petr Burkon, Petr Pospisil, Marek Slavik, Zdenek Rehak, Radim Jancalek, Pavel Slampa, Ondrej Slaby, Radek Lakomy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology and oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05608395 (11C-methionine in Diagnostics and Management of Glioblastoma Multiforme With Rapid Early Progression Patients Prior to Adjuvant Oncological Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05608395 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

11C-methionine in Diagnostics and Management of Glioblastoma Multiforme With Rapid Early Progression Patients Prior to Adjuvant Oncological Therapy (GlioMET)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasaryk Memorial Cancer InstituteRan2020 to 2024Enrolled33ConditionsGlioblastoma MultiformeArms11C-Methionine PET/CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. BMC cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Imaging Glioblastoma WithFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tomas KazdaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Adam DziackyFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr BurkonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr PospisilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marek SlavikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Zdenek RehakDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Masaryk Memorial Cancer, Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radim JancalekDepartment of Neurosurgery - St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavel SlampaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ondrej SlabyCentral European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radek LakomyDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current standard of care of glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has remained unchanged for over a decade. Nevertheless, some improvements in patient outcomes have occurred as a consequence of modern surgery, improved radiotherapy and up-to-date management of toxicity. Patients from control arms (receiving standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide) of recent clinical trials achieve better outcomes compared to the median survival of 14.6 months reported in Stupp's landmark clinical trial in 2005. The approach to radiotherapy that emerged from Stupp's trial, which continues to be a basis for the current standard of care, is no longer applicable and there is a need to develop updated guidelines for radiotherapy within the daily clinical practice that address or at least acknowledge existing controversies in the planning of radiotherapy.The goal of this review is to provoke critical thinking about potentially controversial aspects in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma, including among others the issue of target definitions, simultaneously integrated boost technique, and hippocampal sparing.

conclusionsIn conjunction with new treatment approaches such as tumor-treating fields (TTF) and immunotherapy, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy will be further defined. The personalized approach in daily radiotherapy practice is enabled with modern radiotherapy systems.

Indexed as

controversyglioblastomaradiation therapyradiotherapy dosagetarget volumes

Identifiers

PMID30018514
PMCPMC6043880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.