Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30018480›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2018

New horizons in the endoscopic ultrasonography-based diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions.

María-Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez, Bertrand Napoléon

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. State-of-the-Art Update of Pancreatic Cysts.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. New and emerging technology in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cysts.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

María-Victoria Alvarez-SánchezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra 36003, Spain. victoria.alvarez.sanchez@hotmail.com.
Bertrand NapoléonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ramsay Générale de Santé Private Hospital Jean Mermoz, Lyon 69008, France.
Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra · ESGénérale de Santé · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly being identified because of the widespread use of high-resolution abdominal imaging. These cysts encompass a spectrum from malignant disease to benign lesions, and therefore, accurate diagnosis is crucial to determine the best management strategy, either surgical resection or surveillance. However, the current standard of diagnosis is not accurate enough due to limitations of imaging and tissue sampling techniques, which entail the risk of unnecessary burdensome surgery for benign lesions or missed opportunities of prophylactic surgery for potentially malignant PCLs. In the last decade, endoscopic innovations based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) imaging have emerged, aiming to overcome the present limitations. These new EUS-based technologies are contrast harmonic EUS, needle-based confocal endomicroscopy, through-the-needle cystoscopy and through-the needle intracystic biopsy. Here, we present a comprehensive and critical review of these emerging endoscopic tools for the diagnosis of PCLs, with a special emphasis on feasibility, safety and diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

BiopsyEndosonographyHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalNeedlesPancreasPancreatic CystReproducibility of ResultsConfocal endomicroscopyContrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasonographyEndoscopic ultrasonographyIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmMucinous cystadenomaPancreatic cystic lesionsSerous cystadenomaThrough-the-needle cystoscopyThrough-the-needle forceps biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30018480
PMCPMC6048425
OpenAlexW2851011897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.