Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30018457›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2019

Plasma concentrations of anserine, carnosine and pi-methylhistidine as biomarkers of habitual meat consumption.

Patricia Mitry, Nina Wawro, Sabine Rohrmann, Pieter Giesbertz, Hannelore Daniel, Jakob Linseisen

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia MitryIndependent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Nina WawroIndependent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Sabine RohrmannDivision of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pieter GiesbertzChair of Nutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Hannelore DanielChair of Nutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Jakob LinseisenIndependent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. j.linseisen@unika-t.de.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DETechnical University of Munich · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) FK 2814ERA02E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesDietary intake of red and processed meat has been associated with disease risk. Since dietary intake assessment methods are prone to measurement errors, identifying biomarkers of meat intake in bio-samples could provide more valid intake estimates. We examined associations of habitual red and processed meat, poultry, fish, and dairy products consumption with plasma concentrations of anserine, carnosine, pi-methylhistidine (Π-MH), tau-methylhistidine (T-MH), and the ratio of T-MH to Π-MH in a cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS/

methodsPlasma anserine, carnosine, Π-MH, and T-MH concentrations were measured using ion-pair LC-MS/MS in 294 participants in the second Bavarian Food Consumption Survey (BVS II). Habitual food consumption was assessed using three 24-h dietary recalls. Associations between plasma metabolites concentrations and meat, fish, eggs, and dairy products consumption were assessed by fitting generalized linear model, adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.

resultsTotal meat intake was associated with plasma concentrations of anserine, carnosine, Π-MH and, the ratio of T-MH to Π-MH. Red meat intake was related to carnosine (p-trend = 0.0028) and Π-MH plasma levels (p-trend = 0.0493). Poultry (p-trend = 0.0006) and chicken (p-trend = 0.0003) intake were associated with Π-MH. The highest anserine concentrations were observed in individuals consuming processed meat or turkey. For T-MH we did not observe any association with meat intake.

conclusionsOur results indicate an association between habitual meat consumption and plasma concentrations of anserine, carnosine, Π-MH and the ratio of T-MH to Π-MH. Intervention studies should clarify whether the analyzed plasma metabolites are indicative for a specific type of meat before proposing them as biomarkers of habitual meat intake in epidemiologic studies.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMeatNutrition AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnserineBiomarkersCarnosineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMethylhistidines1-methylhistidineAnserineBiomarkersCarnosineMethylhistidines

Identifiers

PMID30018457
OpenAlexW2884237881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.