ArticleNature communications2018
An intercross population study reveals genes associated with body size and plumage color in ducks.
Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph
Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 149 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
149 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 426 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Integrating landscape genomics and machine learning to analyze the genetic structure and specific molecular markers of Chinese dairy goats (Capra hircus).Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Integrated Analysis of SNPs and Structural Variations via High-depth Whole-genome Sequencing Reveals the Genetic Architecture and Optimizes Genomic Prediction in Chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Development and Characterization of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping Panel for Duck Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analyses reveal new insights into the genetic mechanisms of external genitalia erectile dysfunction in male geese.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Bayesian fine-mapping pinpoints candidate genes and pleiotropic loci of production traits from a chicken backcrossing scheme.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed potential candidate genes for egg production traits in domesticated ducks.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic basis of meat quality traits in Sichuan Shelduck.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Article
- The hybridization analysis of pedigree: whole-genome re-sequencing reveals genomics characterization and genetic basis of growth trait of Qinchuan black pigs.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Hybridisation between different species of waterfowl.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Molecular Characterization and Functional Insights into Goose IGF2BP2 During Skeletal Muscle Development.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Identification of Genes Related to Rapid Growth of Giant Grouper (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The Role of theLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals novel loci associated with body size and carcass yields in Shaoxing ducks.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Detection of differentially expressed genes in bantam chickens providing insights into chicken dwarfism.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Identification of SNPs in the second intron ofAnimal biotechnology · 2025Article
- Research note: Pool sequencing nominates MITF as a key candidate gene for white-belted feathers in chickens.Poultry science · 2025Article
- Insight Into Body Size Evolution in Aves: Based on Some Body Size-Related Genes.Integrative zoology · 2025Article
- Widespread Variation in EDNRB2 Is Associated With Diverse Melanin Loss Phenotypes Across Avian Species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Zhengkui ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-2465
Ming LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7049-8666
Hong ChengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Wenlei FanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhengrong YuanCollege of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Qiang GaoInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Yaxi XuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhanbao GuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yunsheng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jian HuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Hehe LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Dapeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Weihuang ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Zhuqing ZhengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
Yong JiangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhiguo WenState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yongming LiuBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Hua ChenBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-6561
Ming XieState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Wei HuangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Wen WangResearch Center for Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710129, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7801-2066
Shuisheng HouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition; Key Laboratory of Animal (Poultry) Genetics Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. houss@263.net.
Yu JiangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China. yu.jiang@nwafu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-3585
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare · INNorthwest A&F University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNNorth West Agriculture and Forestry University · CNBeijing Forestry University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNorthwestern Polytechnical University · CN
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative population genomics offers an opportunity to discover the signatures of artificial selection during animal domestication, however, their function cannot be directly revealed. We discover the selection signatures using genome-wide comparisons among 40 mallards, 36 indigenous-breed ducks, and 30 Pekin ducks. Then, the phenotypes are fine-mapped based on resequencing of 1026 ducks from an F
Indexed as
GenomeAnimalsAvian ProteinsBody SizeColorCrosses, GeneticDomesticationDucksFeathersFemaleGene ExpressionGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeMaleMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorMutationAvian ProteinsMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.