Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30018286›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Electric pulse characteristics can enable species recognition in African weakly electric fish species.

Rebecca Nagel, Frank Kirschbaum, Volker Hofmann, Jacob Engelmann, Ralph Tiedemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Intergenus F1-hybrids of African weakly electric fish (Mormyridae: Gnathonemus petersii ♂ × Campylomormyrus compressirostris ♀) are fertile.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ontogeny of electric organ and electric organ discharge in Campylomormyrus rhynchophorus (Teleostei: Mormyridae).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca NagelUnit of Evolutionary Biology and Systematic Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry/Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2925-1028
Frank KirschbaumFaculty of Life Sciences, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Unit of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Humboldt University of Berlin, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Volker HofmannActive Sensing, Faculty of Biology, Cognitive Interaction Technology - Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, 33602, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5149-603X
Jacob EngelmannActive Sensing, Faculty of Biology, Cognitive Interaction Technology - Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, 33602, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ralph TiedemannUnit of Evolutionary Biology and Systematic Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry/Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. tiedeman@uni-potsdam.de.

Funding

Universität Potsdam (University of Potsdam) n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication is key to a wide variety of animal behaviours and multiple modalities are often involved in this exchange of information from sender to receiver. The communication of African weakly electric fish, however, is thought to be predominantly unimodal and is mediated by their electric sense, in which species-specific electric organ discharges (EODs) are generated in a context-dependent and thus variable sequence of pulse intervals (SPI). While the primary function of the electric sense is considered to be electrolocation, both of its components likely carry information regarding identity of the sender. However, a clear understanding of their contribution to species recognition is incomplete. We therefore analysed these two electrocommunication components (EOD waveform and SPI statistics) in two sympatric mormyrid Campylomormyrus species. In a set of five playback conditions, we further investigated which components may drive interspecific recognition and discrimination. While we found that both electrocommunication components are species-specific, the cues necessary for species recognition differ between the two species studied. While the EOD waveform and SPI were both necessary and sufficient for species recognition in C. compressirostris males, C. tamandua males apparently utilize other, non-electric modalities. Mapped onto a recent phylogeny, our results suggest that discrimination by electric cues alone may be an apomorphic trait evolved during a recent radiation in this taxon.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationElectricityAnimalsBehavior, AnimalElectric FishFemaleMalePrincipal Component AnalysisSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID30018286
PMCPMC6050243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.