ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018
Shared Decision-Making and Women's Adherence to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sociocultural factors influencing women's adherence to colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of an educational tool on young women's knowledge of cervical cancer screening recommendations.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Trial
- Accessibility and Decision-Supportive Quality of Benign Breast Disease Articles on Chinese Hospital WeChat Public Accounts: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Shared decision-making in Cervical Cancer Care at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Because Doing "It" Matters to Patients: Development and Evaluation of a What Matters to Me Tool That Elicits Patients' Priorities to Support Cancer Treatment Shared Decision-Making.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Dissemination and implementation science frameworks and strategies to increase breast cancer screening for at-risk women in the United States: A scoping review.Journal of public health research · 2024Article
- Characterizing Decision-Making Surrounding Exercise in ARVC: Analysis of Decisional Conflict, Decisional Regret, and Shared Decision-Making.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2023Article
- Proactively tailoring implementation: the case of shared decision-making for lung cancer screening across the VA New England Healthcare Network.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Physically fit with a higher cancer risk? Influences of cervical cancer screening among a sample of physically active women ages 21-49 living in the United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Treatment Adherence in CKD and Support From Health care Providers: A Qualitative Study.Kidney medicine · 2022 · on this mapArticle
- Diversity of interpretations of the concept "patient-centered care for breast cancer patients"; a scoping review of current literature.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2022Article
- Towards a cervical cancer-free future: women's healthcare decision making and cervical cancer screening uptake in sub-Saharan Africa.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The effect of decision-aid-based counseling on cervical cancer screening behavior among women: An interventional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Patients' views of shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey in China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Association of shared decision making with inpatient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?"Journal of health communication · 2020Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Screening among Migrant Women of African Origin: A Qualitative Study in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The association between social media use for health related information and compliance with breast and cervical cancer screenings.Research reports (Montgomery) · 2020Article
- Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) on women's adherence to breast and cervical cancer screenings and estimated the prevalence and adherence rate of screenings. The study used a descriptive cross-sectional design using the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) data collected by the National Cancer Institute. Adherence was defined based on the guidelines from the American Cancer Society and the composite measure of shared decision-making was constructed using three items in the data. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association between the SDM and adherence, controlling for cancer beliefs and socio-demographic variables. The analysis included 742 responses. Weighted to represent the U.S. population, 68.1% adhered to both breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines. The composite measure of SDM was reliable (α = 0.85), and a higher SDM score was associated with women's screening adherence (b = 0.17;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.