ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2018
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of etoposide - silk wafers for neuroblastoma treatment.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Silk protein plastics for sustained and controlled drug release.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Exploring the vast potentials and probable limitations of novel and nanostructured implantable drug delivery systems for cancer treatment.EXCLI journal · 2024Review
- Novel Meta-iodobenzylguanidine and Etoposide Complex: Physicochemical Characterization and Mathematical Modeling of Anticancer Activity.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Article
- Sericultural By-Products: The Potential for Alternative Therapy in Cancer Drug Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Silk Fibroin Microneedle Patches for the Sustained Release of Levonorgestrel.ACS applied bio materials · 2020Article
- Enhancing sustained-release local therapy: Single versus dual chemotherapy for the treatment of neuroblastoma.Surgery · 2020Article
- Silk Reservoirs for Local Delivery of Cisplatin for Neuroblastoma Treatment: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluations.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2019Article
- Extended release formulations using silk proteins for controlled delivery of therapeutics.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2019Review
- Established and Emerging Strategies for Drug Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier in Brain Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2019Review
- Sustained release silk fibroin discs: Antibody and protein delivery for HIV prevention.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019Article
- Advances in immunotherapy delivery from implantable and injectable biomaterials.Acta biomaterialia · 2019Review
- Developing preclinical models of neuroblastoma: driving therapeutic testing.BMC biomedical engineering · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
High-risk neuroblastoma requires surgical resection and multi-drug chemotherapy. This study aimed to develop an extended release, implantable and degradable delivery system for etoposide, commonly used for neuroblastoma treatment. Different concentrations of silk, a biodegradable, non-toxic, non-immunogenic material were employed to prepare etoposide-loaded wafer formulations. Secondary structure of silk in the formulations was characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and optimized based on the crystalline structure. Accelerated in vitro degradation studies under different conditions such as acidic, alkaline, oxidizing mediums and high temperature, were performed. The integrity of the silk wafer structure was maintained unless exposed to 0.1 N NaOH for 24 h. In vitro release of etoposide was performed in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) at 37 °C. Silk coated 6% wafers released the drug up to 45 days, while uncoated wafers released the drug for 30 days. Cytotoxicity study was performed on KELLY cells to evaluate the etoposide cytotoxicity (LC50) and the long-term efficacy of the etoposide wafer formulations. The results showed that etoposide killed 50% of the cells at 1 μg/mL concentration and the wafer formulations demonstrated significant cytotoxicity up to 22 days when compared to untreated cells. Using an orthotopic neuroblastoma mouse model, intra-tumoral implantation of the coated 6%, uncoated 6%, or uncoated 3% silk wafers were all effective at decreasing tumor growth. Histological examination revealed tumor cell necrosis adjacent to the drug-loaded silk wafer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.