Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30018030›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2018

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of etoposide - silk wafers for neuroblastoma treatment.

Burcin Yavuz, Jasmine Zeki, Jeannine M Coburn, Naohiko Ikegaki, Daniel Levitin, David L Kaplan, Bill Chiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Silk protein plastics for sustained and controlled drug release.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Sustained release silk fibroin discs: Antibody and protein delivery for HIV prevention.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Burcin YavuzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Jasmine ZekiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jeannine M CoburnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Naohiko IkegakiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daniel LevitinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA. Electronic address: david.kaplan@tufts.edu.
Bill ChiuDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: bhsc@stanford.edu.
Tufts University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USStanford Medicine · USWorcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Focal Sustained Release Chemotherapy-Loaded Biomaterials at Tumor SitesR01NS094218 · NINDS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI CHIU, BILL, KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk neuroblastoma requires surgical resection and multi-drug chemotherapy. This study aimed to develop an extended release, implantable and degradable delivery system for etoposide, commonly used for neuroblastoma treatment. Different concentrations of silk, a biodegradable, non-toxic, non-immunogenic material were employed to prepare etoposide-loaded wafer formulations. Secondary structure of silk in the formulations was characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and optimized based on the crystalline structure. Accelerated in vitro degradation studies under different conditions such as acidic, alkaline, oxidizing mediums and high temperature, were performed. The integrity of the silk wafer structure was maintained unless exposed to 0.1 N NaOH for 24 h. In vitro release of etoposide was performed in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) at 37 °C. Silk coated 6% wafers released the drug up to 45 days, while uncoated wafers released the drug for 30 days. Cytotoxicity study was performed on KELLY cells to evaluate the etoposide cytotoxicity (LC50) and the long-term efficacy of the etoposide wafer formulations. The results showed that etoposide killed 50% of the cells at 1 μg/mL concentration and the wafer formulations demonstrated significant cytotoxicity up to 22 days when compared to untreated cells. Using an orthotopic neuroblastoma mouse model, intra-tumoral implantation of the coated 6%, uncoated 6%, or uncoated 3% silk wafers were all effective at decreasing tumor growth. Histological examination revealed tumor cell necrosis adjacent to the drug-loaded silk wafer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBombyxCell Line, TumorDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug ImplantsEtoposideFemaleHumansMice, NudeNeuroblastomaSilkAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsEtoposideSilkChemotheraphyDrug deliveryEtoposideImplantsNeuroblastomaSilkSustained release

Identifiers

PMID30018030
PMCPMC6098973
OpenAlexW2811450427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.