Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30017956›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2018

Potential Brain Age Reversal after Pregnancy: Younger Brains at 4-6 Weeks Postpartum.

Eileen Luders, Malin Gingnell, Inger Sundström Poromaa, Jonas Engman, Florian Kurth, Christian Gaser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. BrainAGE, brain health, and mental disorders: A systematic review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protective role of parenthood on age-related brain function in mid- to late-life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Age-related behavioral resilience in smartphone touchscreen interaction dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eileen LudersSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: e.lueders@auckland.ac.nz.
Malin GingnellDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Inger Sundström PoromaaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jonas EngmanDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Florian KurthSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christian GaserDepartments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

Brain and behavior in individuals with intersex conditionsR01HD081720 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE · PI HINES, MELISSA, LUEDERS, EILEEN · 2015 to 2020
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy is accompanied by complex biological adaptations, including extreme hormonal fluctuations. Moreover, changes on the endocrine level are accompanied by changes in cerebral anatomy, such as reductions in brain or gray matter volume. Since declining brain and tissue volumes are characteristic for normal aging, the question arises of whether such pregnancy-induced anatomical effects are permanent or transient. To answer this question, we acquired high-resolution brain image data of 14 healthy women in their mid-twenties to late thirties at two time points: within 1-2 days of childbirth (early postpartum) and at 4-6 weeks after childbirth (late postpartum). At both time points, we estimated the brain ages for each woman using a well-validated machine learning approach based on pattern recognition. Ultimately, this algorithm - designed to identify anatomical correlates of age across the entire brain - reveals a single score for each individual: the BrainAGE index. Comparing the BrainAGE indices between both time points, female brains at late postpartum were estimated to be considerably younger than at early postpartum. On average, that difference was about five years (mean ± SD: 5.4 ± 2.4 years). These findings suggest a substantial restoration/rejuvenation effect after giving birth, which is evident already within the first couple of months.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsBrainEstradiolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPostpartum PeriodPregnancyProgesteroneRejuvenationTime FactorsEstradiolProgesteroneagingbrainestradiolpregnancyprogesterone

Identifiers

PMID30017956
PMCPMC6159922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.