Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2018
Detection of EGFR mutations in plasma circulating tumour DNA as a selection criterion for first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (BENEFIT): a phase 2, single-arm, multicentre clinical trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 127 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Blood Detection of EGFR Mutation For Iressa Treatment
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib With Anlotinib in Advanced Non-squamous NSCLC Patients With Uncleared Plasma ctDNA EGFRm After First-line Treatment With Gefitinib
A Prospective, Pilot Study of First-line Osimertinib With or Without Savolitinib in de Novo MET Positive, EGFR-mutant NSCLCs (FLOWERS)
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Clinical Study of the Combination of Anlotinib and Aumolertinib in the First-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR 21L858R Mutation
Who cites it
127 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The prognostic role of circulating DNA markers in patients with lung malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Plasma ctDNA kinetics as a predictor of systemic therapy response for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The oncologist · 2025Pooled it
- EGFR-plasma mutations in prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR TKIs: A meta-analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Droplet Digital PCR and Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in Cell-Free DNA of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Osimertinib plus anlotinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with concurrent alterations: a multicenter phase II study.The oncologist · 2026Trial
- Osimertinib with or without savolitinib as first-line treatment for MET-aberrant, EGFR-mutant NSCLC: randomized phase 2 trial (FLOWERS).Nature communications · 2026Trial
- The efficacy and safety of chemo-free therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A single-arm, phase II study.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Mefatinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase Ib/II efficacy and biomarker study.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Evaluation of plasma EGFR mutation as an early predictor of response of erlotinib plus bevacizumab treatment in the NEJ026 study.EBioMedicine · 2020Trial
- Longitudinal HER2 amplification tracked in circulating tumor DNA for therapeutic effect monitoring and prognostic evaluation in patients with breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Trial
- Aumolertinib with carboplatin-pemetrexed versus aumolertinib for nonsmall cell lung cancer with EGFR and concomitant tumor suppressor genes (ACROSS2): An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansTrial
- Predictive modeling of peripheral blood EGFR positivity in patients with advanced primary non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Precision de-escalation of immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a case report on ctDNA-guided management in a long-term survivor.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib in Chinese patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study (FLOURISH).Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Observational
- Genomic characterization of DNA damage response pathway mutations reveals their adverse impact on EGFR-TKI efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Updates in the Management of EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).Current oncology reports · 2026Review
67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrections.2018
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetection of EGFR mutations in tumour tissue is the gold-standard approach to ascertain if a patient will benefit from treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, if tissue is scant, another strategy is to use circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), but this method needs validation in clinical trials. We did a prospective clinical trial to assess ctDNA-based EGFR mutation detection as a selection criterion for patients with lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib as first-line treatment.
methodsBENEFIT is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial at 15 centres in China. Patients aged 18-75 years with stage IV metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations detected in ctDNA were given oral gefitinib 250 mg once daily as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion achieving an objective response. Secondary endpoints included median progression-free survival and safety. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a 168-gene panel was used for genetic analysis of baseline blood samples. The primary efficacy analysis was done by intention to treat in patients who had at least one post-baseline tumour assessment. The safety analysis was done in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02282267.
findingsBetween Dec 25, 2014, and Jan 16, 2016, 426 patients were screened for the trial, of whom 188 with EGFR mutations in ctDNA were enrolled and received gefitinib. 183 patients had one or more post-baseline tumour assessment and were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Median follow-up was 14·5 months (IQR 12·2-16·5). At the time of data cutoff (Jan 31, 2017), 152 patients had progressive disease or had died. The proportion achieving an objective response was 72·1% (95% CI 65·0-78·5). Median progression-free survival was 9·5 months (95% CI 9·07-11·04). Of 167 patients with available blood samples, 147 (88%) showed clearance of EGFR mutations in ctDNA at week 8, and median progression-free survival was longer for these patients than for the 20 patients whose EGFR mutations persisted at week 8 (11·0 months [95% CI 9·43-12·85] vs 2·1 months [1·81-3·65]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·14, 95% CI 0·08-0·23; p<0·0001). From baseline NGS data in 179 patients, we identified three subgroups of patients: those with EGFR mutations only (n=58), those with mutations in EGFR and tumour-suppressor genes (n=97), and those with mutations in EGFR and oncogenes (n=24). Corresponding median progression-free survival in these subgroups was 13·2 months (95% CI 11·5-15·0), 9·3 months (7·6-11·0), and 4·7 months (1·9-9·3), respectively (EGFR mutations only vs mutations in EGFR and tumour-suppressor genes, HR 1·78, 95% CI 1·23-2·58; p=0·002; EGFR mutations only vs mutations in EGFR and oncogenes, 2·66, 1·58-4·49; p=0·0003). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hepatic function abnormalities (n=24). Serious adverse events were reported in 17 (9%) patients. No unexpected safety events for gefitinib were recorded.
interpretationDetection of EGFR mutations in ctDNA is an effective method to identify patients who might benefit from first-line gefitinib treatment. Further analyses of dynamic alterations of EGFR mutations and accompanying gene aberrances could predict resistance to gefitinib.
fundingGuangdong Association of Clinical Trials, AstraZeneca, National Natural Sciences Foundation Key Programme, and National Key Research and Development Programme of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30017884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.