Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30017875›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

Fine needle non-aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node tuberculosis: a single center experience.

Moncef Sellami, Slim Charfi, Mohamed Amine Chaabouni, Salma Mrabet, Ilhem Charfeddine, Lobna Ayadi, Souha Kallel, Abdelmonem Ghorbel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Diagnostic of Cervical Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: PCR is a Fast, Efficient, and Improved Diagnostic Approach.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moncef SellamiHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sfax, Tunisia. Electronic address: sellami_moncef@yahoo.fr.
Slim CharfiHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Anatomopathology, Sfax, Tunisia.
Mohamed Amine ChaabouniHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sfax, Tunisia.
Salma MrabetHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sfax, Tunisia.
Ilhem CharfeddineHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sfax, Tunisia.
Lobna AyadiHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Anatomopathology, Sfax, Tunisia.
Souha KallelHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sfax, Tunisia.
Abdelmonem GhorbelHabib Bourguiba University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sfax, Tunisia.
Hopital Universitaire Habib Bourguiba · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe fine-needle cytology is being used as a first line of investigation in the diagnosis of head and neck swellings, as it is simple, cost effective and less invasive as compared to biopsy.

objectiveThe aims of this study were to evaluate the results of the fine-needle non-aspiration cytology of cervical lymphadenopathy and to study the factors influencing the rate of non-diagnosis results.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on selected patients with cervical lymphadenopathy that had undergone a fine-needle non-aspiration cytology followed by a histological biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of fine-needle non-aspiration cytology for diagnosing tuberculosis were estimated. The risk factors of non-diagnosis results were evaluated.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value rates of fine-needle non-aspiration cytology for tuberculosis were 83.3%, 83.3%, 78.9% and 86.9% respectively. In total, 47 out of the 131 samples (35.8%) were considered non-diagnosis. Of the non-diagnosis samples, 84.2% (38 out of 47) were benign mostly due to tuberculosis (30 cases). Among the studied factors, only tuberculosis (confirmed by histopathological examination) was significantly associated with non-diagnosis cytology (p=0.02, Odds-Ratio=2.35).

conclusionTuberculosis is currently the commonest cause of cervical lymphadenopathy in North Africa. Fine-needle non-aspiration cytology is safe and accurate in the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymph node that is associated with the risk of non-diagnosis cytology.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTuberculosis, Lymph NodeYoung AdultCervicalCitologiaCytologyLinfadenopatiaLymphadenopathyNon-aspiration techniqueTécnica não-aspirativaTuberculoseTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID30017875
PMCPMC9443027
OpenAlexW2810315773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.