ArticleHeart rhythm2018
Cardiac impact of R-wave triggered irreversible electroporation therapy.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world safety of irreversible electroporation therapy for tumors with nanoknife: MAUDE database analysis.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Advances in irreversible electroporation for prostate cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Pulsed Field Ablation of the Porcine Ventricle Using a Focal Lattice-Tip Catheter.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2022Article
- Cardiac impact of high-frequency irreversible electroporation using an asymmetrical waveform on liver in vivo.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Review
- Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of Hepatic Malignancy: A Bi-institutional Analysis of Safety and Outcomes.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2019Article
- Irreversible electroporation: Proceed with caution.Heart rhythm · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel tumor ablative therapy technique, using electric fields to induce apoptosis in target tissues. Whether these electric pulses of high field strength can cause cardiac damage and/or ablation-induced arrhythmias is unclear.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the safety of electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated IRE with regard to cardiac side effects.
methodsIn all patients, 12-lead ECG and signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) recordings were performed before and after IRE and 24-hour Holter recording on the day of the IRE procedure. Venous blood samples (N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], high-sensitive troponin I [hsTnI]) were obtained before and 4 and 16 hours after the procedure. Patients with abnormal findings were reevaluated after 3 months.
resultsIn total, 26 patients with an oncologic indication for IRE (11 females, mean age 62.9 years) were prospectively enrolled. Nine patients (34.6%) showed an increase in hsTnI and 21 patients (80.8%) an increase in NT-proBNP after ablation. Fifteen patients (57%) developed arrhythmias related to the procedure. One patient, in whom hsTnI and NT-proBNP had increased, developed multiple, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia events. In another patient, atrial fibrillation was triggered twice in 2 separate procedures. Twelve patients had clinically benign arrhythmias. SAECG was negative in all patients.
conclusionSubclinical myocardial injury and nonfatal cardiac arrhythmias can occur in the context of IRE treatment. Although no sustained cardiac injuries could be found at 3-month follow-up, we propose implementation of a cardiac safety algorithm consisting of cardiac biomarkers and ECG monitoring when IRE is conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.