ArticleNeuroImage2018
Integrative Bayesian analysis of brain functional networks incorporating anatomical knowledge.
Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A modeling framework for detecting and leveraging node-level information in Bayesian network inference.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- A novel integration of brain structural and functional connectivity for identifying traumatic brain injury induced perturbations.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2025Article
- Connectome spectrum electromagnetic tomography: A method to reconstruct electrical brain source networks at high-spatial resolution.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Characterization of Resting-State Functional Connectivity Changes in Hypertension by a Modified Difference Degree Test.Brain connectivity · 2023Article
- FBNetGen: Task-aware GNN-based fMRI Analysis via Functional Brain Network Generation.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2022Article
- Multimodal data integration via mediation analysis with high-dimensional exposures and mediators.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- A Multimodal Multilevel Neuroimaging Model for Investigating Brain Connectome Development.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022Article
- Interpretive JIVE: Connections with CCA and an application to brain connectivity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Developing Multimodal Dynamic Functional Connectivity as a Neuroimaging Biomarker.Brain connectivity · 2021Article
- Surface-Based Connectivity Integration: An atlas-free approach to jointly study functional and structural connectivity.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- BVAR-Connect: A Variational Bayes Approach to Multi-Subject Vector Autoregressive Models for Inference on Brain Connectivity Networks.Neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Toward a Better Estimation of Functional Brain Network for Mild Cognitive Impairment Identification: A Transfer Learning View.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2020Article
- Group Similarity Constraint Functional Brain Network Estimation for Mild Cognitive Impairment Classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Educational fMRI: From the Lab to the Classroom.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, there has been increased interest in fusing multimodal imaging to better understand brain organization by integrating information on both brain structure and function. In particular, incorporating anatomical knowledge leads to desirable outcomes such as increased accuracy in brain network estimates and greater reproducibility of topological features across scanning sessions. Despite the clear advantages, major challenges persist in integrative analyses including an incomplete understanding of the structure-function relationship and inaccuracies in mapping anatomical structures due to inherent deficiencies in existing imaging technology. This calls for the development of advanced network modeling tools that appropriately incorporate anatomical structure in constructing brain functional networks. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian Gaussian graphical modeling approach which models the brain functional networks via sparse precision matrices whose degree of edge specific shrinkage is a random variable that is modeled using both anatomical structure and an independent baseline component. The proposed approach adaptively shrinks functional connections and flexibly identifies functional connections supported by structural connectivity knowledge. This enables robust brain network estimation even in the presence of misspecified anatomical knowledge, while accommodating heterogeneity in the structure-function relationship. We implement the approach via an efficient optimization algorithm which yields maximum a posteriori estimates. Extensive numerical studies involving multiple functional network structures reveal the clear advantages of the proposed approach over competing methods in accurately estimating brain functional connectivity, even when the anatomical knowledge is misspecified up to a certain degree. An application of the approach to data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) study reveals gender based connectivity differences across multiple age groups, and higher reproducibility in the estimation of network metrics compared to alternative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.