ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2018
Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery.
Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scrotal Size Index: a novel anatomical classification of scrotal morphology in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy, reliability, and patient satisfaction with Rigicon Infla10 X and Infla10 AX inflatable penile prostheses: a retrospective single-center analysis.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Agreement between an anatomy-based inflatable penile prosthesis configuration algorithm and expert surgeon decision-making: a virtual case study.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Restoring sexual health and relationship quality through penile prosthesis implantation.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Optimizing cylinder selection in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Early complications after penile prosthesis surgery: findings from the PHOENIX multicenter registry.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the satisfaction survey for inflatable penile implant: The SSIPI-AR.Arab journal of urology · 2026Article
- Patients' satisfaction rate after penile implant surgery: a cross-sectional investigation from the middle east.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Immediate salvage procedure for infected penile prostheses: A review of the advances in surgical technique and antimicrobial strategies.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Interim Results of Rigicon Penile Prosthesis Implantation in a Single Center: The Largest Series in Türkiye.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
- Penile prosthesis implantation is safe and effective in Peyronie's disease patients with and without erectile dysfunction.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Value of prolonged scrotal drainage after penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature.Asian journal of andrology · 2024Review
- Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease: a review of surgical considerations, approaches, and maneuvers.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Penile prosthesis in the medically complex patient: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Assessing psychiatric risk with a focus on optimizing patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis placement-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Patient selection, counseling and preparation for penile prosthesis.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after penile prosthesis placement in men with and without Peyronie's disease.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Comment on "Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after penile prosthesis placement in men with and without Peyronie's disease".International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Under-recognized factors affecting penile implant satisfaction in patients.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite the high satisfaction with penile implant (PI) surgery reported in the literature, a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied.
aimTo evaluate satisfaction after PI surgery, using a single question and a scoring system. Furthermore, we attempted to define factors that predicted high patient satisfaction.
methodsThe study population consisted of all patients undergoing PI surgery between 2009 and 2015. Comorbidity, demographic, and implant information were recorded. Complications recorded included: minor (requiring no re-operation) such as penile or scrotal hematoma, superficial wound breakdown; major (requiring hospitalization or re-operation) such as device infection, erosion, and mechanical malfunction. Patient satisfaction was defined using a single question posed to the patient 6 months after surgery using a 5-point Likert scale (5 being the most satisfied). Descriptive statistics were used to define complication rates and multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to define predictors of high satisfaction (score ≥ 4), including presence and degree of complications, Peyronie's disease (PD), diabetes mellitus (DM), number of vascular comorbidities, body mass index (BMI) > 30, and patient age.
main outcome measurePatients with a major complication, with or without an additional minor complication, had a higher likelihood of being dissatisfied (25%) compared to patients with no complication or only minor complication 1.9% (no complications) and 3.7% (only minor complications), P < .001.
results902 patients were analysed. Mean age was 56.6 ± 10.6 years. Mean BMI was 30 ± 5. Comorbidity profile was diabetes 75%, dyslipidaemia 44%, hypertension 33%, cigarette smoking 32%, and PD 34%. 76% had a malleable implant (MPP) and 24% an inflatable implant (IPP). 31% had a minor complication and 9% a major complication. 93% had high satisfaction (score ≥4). Patients with any complication had a reduced rate of high satisfaction (97.5% vs 87.7%; P < .001) and even more pronounced with a major complication (96.7% vs 64.2%; P < .001). On MVA, only the absence of a major complication was a significant predictor of high satisfaction (OR 20, 95% CI 9-50, P < .001).
conclusionA high percentage of men are satisfied after penile implant surgery. Only the presence of a major complication is linked to a lower likelihood of achieving high satisfaction. Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, et al. Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery. J Sex Med 2018;15:1180-1186.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.