Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30017718›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2018

Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery.

Mohamad Habous, Raanan Tal, Alaa Tealab, Mohammed Aziz, Hammoda Sherif, Saad Mahmoud, Osama Abdelwahab, Mohammed Nassar, Usama Kamil, Ziad Abdelrahman and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Patient selection, counseling and preparation for penile prosthesis.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Under-recognized factors affecting penile implant satisfaction in patients.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Mohamad HabousUrology and Andrology Department, Elaj Medical Centers, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: drmhabos@hotmail.com.
Raanan TalSexual and Reproductive Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alaa TealabUrology Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohammed AzizUrology Department, Menoufia University, Al Minufya, Egypt.
Hammoda SherifUrology Department, Benha University, Benha City, Egypt.
Saad MahmoudUrology and Andrology Department, Elaj Medical Centers, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Osama AbdelwahabUrology Department, Benha University, Benha City, Egypt.
Mohammed NassarUrology and Andrology Department, Elaj Medical Centers, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Usama KamilUrology and Andrology Department, Elaj Medical Centers, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziad AbdelrahmanUrology and Andrology Department, Elaj Medical Centers, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh BinsalehDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Simone GionaKing's College, Hospital, London, UK.
David RalphSt. Peter's Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Carlo BettocchiUrology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
John P MulhallSexual and Reproductive Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Benha University · EGMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKing Saud University · SAKing's College Hospital · GBMenoufia University · EGUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITZagazig University · EG

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the high satisfaction with penile implant (PI) surgery reported in the literature, a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied.

aimTo evaluate satisfaction after PI surgery, using a single question and a scoring system. Furthermore, we attempted to define factors that predicted high patient satisfaction.

methodsThe study population consisted of all patients undergoing PI surgery between 2009 and 2015. Comorbidity, demographic, and implant information were recorded. Complications recorded included: minor (requiring no re-operation) such as penile or scrotal hematoma, superficial wound breakdown; major (requiring hospitalization or re-operation) such as device infection, erosion, and mechanical malfunction. Patient satisfaction was defined using a single question posed to the patient 6 months after surgery using a 5-point Likert scale (5 being the most satisfied). Descriptive statistics were used to define complication rates and multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to define predictors of high satisfaction (score ≥ 4), including presence and degree of complications, Peyronie's disease (PD), diabetes mellitus (DM), number of vascular comorbidities, body mass index (BMI) > 30, and patient age.

main outcome measurePatients with a major complication, with or without an additional minor complication, had a higher likelihood of being dissatisfied (25%) compared to patients with no complication or only minor complication 1.9% (no complications) and 3.7% (only minor complications), P < .001.

results902 patients were analysed. Mean age was 56.6 ± 10.6 years. Mean BMI was 30 ± 5. Comorbidity profile was diabetes 75%, dyslipidaemia 44%, hypertension 33%, cigarette smoking 32%, and PD 34%. 76% had a malleable implant (MPP) and 24% an inflatable implant (IPP). 31% had a minor complication and 9% a major complication. 93% had high satisfaction (score ≥4). Patients with any complication had a reduced rate of high satisfaction (97.5% vs 87.7%; P < .001) and even more pronounced with a major complication (96.7% vs 64.2%; P < .001). On MVA, only the absence of a major complication was a significant predictor of high satisfaction (OR 20, 95% CI 9-50, P < .001).

conclusionA high percentage of men are satisfied after penile implant surgery. Only the presence of a major complication is linked to a lower likelihood of achieving high satisfaction. Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, et al. Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery. J Sex Med 2018;15:1180-1186.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAgedBody Mass IndexComorbidityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsComplicationsPenile ImplantsPredictorsSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID30017718
PMCPMC8519171
OpenAlexW2884908403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.