ArticleJournal of structural biology2018
Evaluation system and web infrastructure for the second cryo-EM model challenge.
Article in Journal of structural biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of the EMDataResource cryo-EM Ligand Modeling Challenge.Nature methods · 2024Article
- Cryo-EM targets in CASP14.Proteins · 2021Article
- Cryo-EM model validation recommendations based on outcomes of the 2019 EMDataResource challenge.Nature methods · 2021Article
- Evolving data standards for cryo-EM structures.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Article
- Comparing cryo-EM structures.Journal of structural biology · 2018Article
- Assessment of detailed conformations suggests strategies for improving cryoEM models: Helix at lower resolution, ensembles, pre-refinement fixups, and validation at multi-residue length scale.Journal of structural biology · 2018Article
- Constructing atomic structural models into cryo-EM densities using molecular dynamics - Pros and cons.Journal of structural biology · 2018Article
- Distribution of evaluation scores for the models submitted to the second cryo-EM model challenge.Data in brief · 2018Article
- Evolution of standardization and dissemination of cryo-EM structures and data jointly by the community, PDB, and EMDB.The Journal of biological chemistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An evaluation system and a web infrastructure were developed for the second cryo-EM model challenge. The evaluation system includes tools to validate stereo-chemical plausibility of submitted models, check their fit to the corresponding density maps, estimate their overall and per-residue accuracy, and assess their similarity to reference cryo-EM or X-ray structures as well as other models submitted in this challenge. The web infrastructure provides a convenient interface for analyzing models at different levels of detail. It includes interactively sortable tables of evaluation scores for different subsets of models and different sublevels of structure organization, and a suite of visualization tools facilitating model analysis. The results are publicly accessible at http://model-compare.emdatabank.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.