Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30017551›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2018

Vulnerability to snakebite envenoming: a global mapping of hotspots.

Joshua Longbottom, Freya M Shearer, Maria Devine, Gabriel Alcoba, Francois Chappuis, Daniel J Weiss, Sarah E Ray, Nicolas Ray, David A Warrell, Rafael Ruiz de Castañeda and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 195 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04996264 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of a Multi-Dose Regimen of Oral Varespladib-Methyl in Subjects Bitten by Venomous Snakes

TypeinterventionalSponsorOphirex, Inc.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled95ConditionsSnakebites, Envenoming, Envenoming, Snake, Envenomation, SnakeArmsVarespladib Methyl, Placebo, Standard of care (SOC)
NCT06808789 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Mapping Snakebite Risk in Ghana and Rwanda: Using Primary Data Collection and Geostatistical Techniques to Develop an Approach to Risk Estimation for Snakebite

TypeobservationalSponsorLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineRan2025 to 2026Enrolled32,000ConditionsSnakebite, Snake Envenomation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 352 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review of variables associated with snakebite risk in spatial and temporal analyses.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A Case ofClinical case reports · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Joshua LongbottomBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for Health Informatics, Computing and Statistics, Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK; Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: joshua.longbottom@lstmed.ac.uk.
Freya M ShearerBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maria DevineBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gabriel AlcobaDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Tropical Medicine and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Médecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland.
Francois ChappuisDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel J WeissBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah E RayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicolas RayEnviroSPACE Lab, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
David A WarrellNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rafael Ruiz de CastañedaInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
David J WilliamsAustralian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Simon I HayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: sihay@uw.edu.
David M PigottInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Oxford · GBInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnakebite envenoming is a frequently overlooked cause of mortality and morbidity. Data for snake ecology and existing snakebite interventions are scarce, limiting accurate burden estimation initiatives. Low global awareness stunts new interventions, adequate health resources, and available health care. Therefore, we aimed to synthesise currently available data to identify the most vulnerable populations at risk of snakebite, and where additional data to manage this global problem are needed.

methodsWe assembled a list of snake species using WHO guidelines. Where relevant, we obtained expert opinion range (EOR) maps from WHO or the Clinical Toxinology Resources. We also obtained occurrence data for each snake species from a variety of websites, such as VertNet and iNaturalist, using the spocc R package (version 0.7.0). We removed duplicate occurrence data and categorised snakes into three groups: group A (no available EOR map or species occurrence records), group B (EOR map but <5 species occurrence records), and group C (EOR map and ≥5 species occurrence records). For group C species, we did a multivariate environmental similarity analysis using the 2008 WHO EOR maps and newly available evidence. Using these data and the EOR maps, we produced contemporary range maps for medically important venomous snake species at a 5 × 5 km resolution. We subsequently triangulated these data with three health system metrics (antivenom availability, accessibility to urban centres, and the Healthcare Access and Quality [HAQ] Index) to identify the populations most vulnerable to snakebite morbidity and mortality.

findingsWe provide a map showing the ranges of 278 snake species globally. Although about 6·85 billion people worldwide live within range of areas inhabited by snakes, about 146·70 million live within remote areas lacking quality health-care provisioning. Comparing opposite ends of the HAQ Index, 272·91 million individuals (65·25%) of the population within the lowest decile are at risk of exposure to any snake for which no effective therapy exists compared with 519·46 million individuals (27·79%) within the highest HAQ Index decile, showing a disproportionate coverage in reported antivenom availability. Antivenoms were available for 119 (43%) of 278 snake species evaluated by WHO, while globally 750·19 million (10·95%) of those living within snake ranges live more than 1 h from population centres. In total, we identify about 92·66 million people living within these vulnerable geographies, including many sub-Saharan countries, Indonesia, and other parts of southeast Asia.

interpretationIdentifying exact populations vulnerable to the most severe outcomes of snakebite envenoming at a subnational level is important for prioritising new data collection and collation, reinforcing envenoming treatment, existing health-care systems, and deploying currently available and future interventions. These maps can guide future research efforts on snakebite envenoming from both ecological and public health perspectives and better target future estimates of the burden of this neglected tropical disease.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Africa, NorthernAnimalsAntiveninsGeographic MappingHealth ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIndonesiaNeglected DiseasesPublic HealthQuality of Health CareSnake BitesSnakesVulnerable PopulationsAntivenins

Identifiers

PMID30017551
PMCPMC6115328
OpenAlexW2884065583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.