ArticleTrends in molecular medicine2018
CRISPR: Stressed about p53?
Article in Trends in molecular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA double-strand break-free CRISPR interference delays Huntington's disease progression in mice.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Improving Homology-Directed Repair in Genome Editing Experiments by Influencing the Cell Cycle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Generation of Transgenic Cloned Buffalo Embryos Harboring the EGFP Gene in the Y Chromosome Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Integration.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- THE GORDON WILSON LECTURE: THE ETHICS OF HUMAN GENOME EDITING.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two recent reports show that, in some contexts, CRISPR-mediated genome editing can lead to a p53-mediated stress response and cell-cycle arrest. These findings may help to explain why CRISPR-mediated genetic manipulation in different cell types leads to dissimilar outcomes, and highlights the need for a better understanding of the factors that influence effective genome editing in vitro and in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30017531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.