Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30017481›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

Theta Rhythmic Neuronal Activity and Reaction Times Arising from Cortical Receptive Field Interactions during Distributed Attention.

Ricardo Kienitz, Joscha T Schmiedt, Katharine A Shapcott, Kleopatra Kouroupaki, Richard C Saunders, Michael Christoph Schmid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Partial Occlusion on Response Dynamics and Interregional Processing within Primate Superior Temporal Sulcus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Attention Rhythmically Shapes Sensory Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ricardo KienitzErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt a.M., Germany; Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe University, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528 Frankfurt a.M., Germany; Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Joscha T SchmiedtErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Katharine A ShapcottErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Kleopatra KouroupakiErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Richard C SaundersLaboratory of Neuropsychology, NIMH, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Michael Christoph SchmidErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt a.M., Germany; Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK. Electronic address: michael.schmid@ncl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that distributed spatial attention may invoke theta (3-9 Hz) rhythmic sampling processes. The neuronal basis of such attentional sampling is, however, not fully understood. Here we show using array recordings in visual cortical area V4 of two awake macaques that presenting separate visual stimuli to the excitatory center and suppressive surround of neuronal receptive fields (RFs) elicits rhythmic multi-unit activity (MUA) at 3-6 Hz. This neuronal rhythm did not depend on small fixational eye movements. In the context of a distributed spatial attention task, during which the monkeys detected a spatially and temporally uncertain target, reaction times (RTs) exhibited similar rhythmic fluctuations. RTs were fast or slow depending on the target occurrence during high or low MUA, resulting in rhythmic MUA-RT cross-correlations at theta frequencies. These findings show that theta rhythmic neuronal activity can arise from competitive RF interactions and that this rhythm may result in rhythmic RTs potentially subserving attentional sampling.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSynaptic TransmissionTheta RhythmVisual CortexWakefulnessattentionmicrosaccadesmonkeyneurophysiologyoscillationsrhythmV4visionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID30017481
PMCPMC6089835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.