ArticleDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2018
Critical analysis of a doxycycline treatment trial of rhesus macaques infected with Borrelia burgdorferi.
Article in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the clinical relevance of vancomycin for the treatment of Lyme disease.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
- Lyme disease and the pursuit of a clinical cure.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Persistent Borrelia burgdorferiClinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- Lack of Convincing Evidence That Borrelia burgdorferi Infection Causes Either Alzheimer Disease or Lewy Body Dementia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Article
- Review
- Generality of Post-Antimicrobial Treatment Persistence ofInfection and immunity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A critical analysis was conducted of a doxycycline treatment trial of Indian rhesus macaques. In this treatment trial, the investigators attempted to infect the primates with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto by at least 10 tick bites from artificially infected ticks. None of the primates became ill; nevertheless, 5 primates were treated with a 28-day course of oral doxycycline. In contrast to the conclusions of the authors, the data did not convincingly document the existence of viable B. burgdorferi in antibiotic-treated primates. The investigators were unable to cultivate the spirochete from any animal after treatment using highly sensitive in vitro methods. Like many prior animal studies, the current study also did not document that the doxycycline exposure in these animals was similar to that expected in humans. Numerous additional methodologic problems are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.