Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3001718›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1985

Kinetic properties of a sex pheromone-degrading enzyme: the sensillar esterase of Antheraea polyphemus.

R G Vogt, L M Riddiford, G D Prestwich

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1985. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 342 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Odorant-Binding Proteins and Chemosensory Proteins inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chemosensory protein 4 is required forFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic analysis of the carboxylesterase family in the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis).Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Olfactory coding in honeybees.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R G Vogt
L M Riddiford
G D Prestwich
University of Washington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM07108NIGMS NIH HHS GM07270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence has suggested that sex pheromone is rapidly inactivated within the sensory hairs soon after initiation of the action-potential spike. We report the isolation and characterization of a sex-pheromone-degrading enzyme from the sensory hairs of the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus. In the presence of this enzyme at physiological concentration, the pheromone [(6E,11Z)-hexadecadienyl acetate] has an estimated half-life of 15 msec. Our findings suggest a molecular model for pheromone reception in which a previously reported pheromone-binding protein acts as a pheromone carrier, and an enzyme acts as a rapid pheromone inactivator, maintaining a low stimulus noise level within the sensory hairs.

Indexed as

AcetatesAnimal CommunicationAnimalsEsterasesHemolymphKineticsLepidopteraMothsPheromonesReceptors, Cell SurfaceAcetatesEsterasesPheromonesReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID3001718
PMCPMC391531
OpenAlexW1986648838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.