Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30016998›Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2018

Sex gap in aging and longevity: can sex chromosomes play a role?

Gabriel A B Marais, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Cristina Vieira, Ingrid Plotton, Damien Sanlaville, François Gueyffier, Jean-Francois Lemaitre

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Human studies of mitochondrial biology demonstrate an overall lack of binary sex differences: A multivariate meta-analysis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. RNA variation as the driver of genomic efficiency and phenotypic complexity.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel A B MaraisLaboratoire "Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive"- UMR 5558, CNRS / Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France. gabriel.marais@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2134-5967
Jean-Michel GaillardLaboratoire "Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive"- UMR 5558, CNRS / Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Cristina VieiraLaboratoire "Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive"- UMR 5558, CNRS / Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Ingrid PlottonService d'Endocrinologie Moléculaire et Maladies Rares, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Damien SanlavilleService de Génétique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CRNL, GENDEV team, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
François GueyffierLaboratoire "Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive"- UMR 5558, CNRS / Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Jean-Francois LemaitreLaboratoire "Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive"- UMR 5558, CNRS / Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that women live longer than men. This gap is observed in most human populations and can even reach 10-15 years. In addition, most of the known super centenarians (i.e., humans who lived for > 110 years) are women. The differences in life expectancy between men and women are often attributed to cultural differences in common thinking. However, sex hormones seem to influence differences in the prevalence of diseases, in the magnitude of aging, and in the longevity between men and women. Moreover, far from being human specific, the sex gap in longevity is extremely common in non-human animals, especially in mammals. Biological factors clearly contribute to such a sex gap in aging and longevity. Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain why males and females age and die differently. The cost of sexual selection and sexual dimorphism has long been considered the best explanation for the observed sex gap in aging/longevity. However, the way mitochondria are transmitted (i.e., through females in most species) could have an effect, called the mother's curse. Recent data suggest that sex chromosomes may also contribute to the sex gap in aging/longevity through several potential mechanisms, including the unguarded X/Z, the toxic Y/W and the loss of Y/W. We discuss future research directions to test these ideas.

Indexed as

AgingSex CharacteristicsSex ChromosomesAnimalsHumansAgingKlinefelterLongevityMother’s curseSex chromosomesSex hormonesSexual dimorphismTransposable elementsTurner

Identifiers

PMID30016998
PMCPMC6050741
OpenAlexW2884952480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.