Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30016980›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2018

Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants with special emphasis on medicinal uses in Southern Shan State, Myanmar.

Thant Shin, Kazumi Fujikawa, Aung Zaw Moe, Hiroshi Uchiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From "traditional" to modern medicine: A medical and historical analysis ofJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible fruits in eastern Bhutan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thant ShinCollege of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, 1866 Kameino, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-0880, Japan.
Kazumi FujikawaKochi Prefectural Makino Botanical Garden, 4200-6, Godaisan, Kochi, 781-8125, Japan.
Aung Zaw MoeMinistry of Natural Resource and Environmental Conservation, Forest Research Institute, Yezin, Naypyitaw, Myanmar.
Hiroshi UchiyamaCollege of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, 1866 Kameino, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-0880, Japan. uchiyama.hiroshi@nihon-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1488-6215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyanmar is one of the hotspots of biodiversity and is a rapidly developing country. Performing floristic research in Myanmar is an urgent issue, and ethnobotanical studies of wild edible plants (WEPs) will provide new information on natural plant resources.

methodEthnobotanical data were collected in three villages with different historical backgrounds in Southern Shan State, Myanmar. A total of 19 key informants were interviewed, and specimens were collected in the fields with the participation of key informants in June-July 2015. Group discussions were organized during 2016 and 2017 to reinforce the information on use of WEPs. DNA barcoding was used to facilitate species identification.

resultsA total of 83 species from 44 families of angiosperms were recorded as WEPs. Most of the species were used as wild vegetables (47 species), followed by fruits and nuts (31 species). Eighteen WEPs were consumed as medicinal foods. Differences in use of WEPs between the communities of the villages were observed. The age class of 30-39 years was more familiar with the environments where they could collect WEPs and had more knowledge of WEPs than did the older groups. The use of Elaeocarpus floribundus as an edible oil is a very interesting tradition.

conclusionWEPs play an important role in the livelihood of local communities. The indigenous society has maintained traditional knowledge of the WEPs. Historical background, land use system and surrounding vegetation could have effects on the variation in the traditional uses of WEPs. Increasing awareness of the importance of WEPs will encourage the conservation of traditional knowledge of indigenous populations.

Indexed as

KnowledgePhytotherapyPlants, EdiblePlants, MedicinalAdultBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEthnobotanyHumansMiddle AgedMyanmarDNA barcodeEthnobotanyMedicinal plantsMyanmarWild edible plants

Identifiers

PMID30016980
PMCPMC6050729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.