SynthesisBMC medicine2018
Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of vaccination against human papillomavirus in males: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.
- Penile cancer: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.ESMO open · 2024Guideline
- Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome after vaccination against human papillomavirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 January 2000 to 4 April 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of Sexual Activity on the Risk of Male Genital Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Prevalence of human papillomavirus and subtype distribution in male partners of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Pooled it
- Impact of web-based health education on HPV vaccination uptake among college girl students in Western and Northern China: a follow-up study.BMC women's health · 2022Trial
- Psychosocial factors influencing HPV vaccination intention among male college students in Hangzhou city: A cross-sectional study based on an extended theory of planned behavior model.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Does the evidence support circumcision of infant males in the United Kingdom?-a systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Impact of oncogenic viruses on autoimmune diseases and tumorigenesis.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus among Korean males: Implications for vaccination strategies.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
- Mobile-based blended learning improves human papillomavirus vaccine knowledge among nursing students: An experimental study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Human papillomavirus vaccination in men: a crucial step in Ecuadorian public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- European Code Against Cancer, 5th edition - cancer-causing infections and related interventions.Molecular oncology · 2026Review
- Immune Responses to Human Papillomavirus After Infection and Vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Understanding barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer prevention among young Korean Women: A focus group interview study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Comparison of urine and semen samples for HPV detection: a cross-sectional study in fertility clinic patients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination of men who have sex with men in Germany.Infection · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and willingness towards HPV vaccine among male college students in Zhejiang Province, China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is safe and effective in preventing cervical cancer in females. As HPV infections can also induce cancers of the anus, penis and oral cavity, male vaccination is also advocated, but systematic reviews on efficacy and safety in males are lacking.
methodsWe performed a systematic review on the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of HPV vaccination in males of any age. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to April 2017.
resultsWe identified 5196 articles and seven studies (four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three non-randomized studies) were included, comprising a total of 5294 participants. Vaccine efficacy against at least 6-month persisting anogenital HPV 16 infections was 46.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28.6-60.8%), whereas efficacy against persisting oral infections was 88% (2-98%). A vaccine efficacy of 61.9% (21.4-82.8%) and 46.8% (- 20 to -77.9%) was observed against anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and grade 3 lesions, respectively. No meaningful estimates were available on vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against penile intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, and no data were identified for anal, penile or head and neck squamous cell cancer. In participants who were HPV-seronegative and PCR-negative at enrolment, efficacy against all outcomes was higher as compared to seropositive and/or PCR-positive individuals. Risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in one, while the three non-randomized studies were at serious to critical risk of bias. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation evidence quality was moderate to low for most outcomes.
conclusionsHPV vaccination in males is moderately effective against persistent anogenital HPV infection and high-grade anal intraepithelial lesions in studies where the population consists mainly of HPV-infected males. Vaccine effectiveness was high in study groups comprising HPV-naïve males. This supports a recommendation for vaccination of boys before the onset of sexual activity with the goal of establishing optimal vaccine-induced protection. Mathematical modelling studies will still be needed to assess the effects of adding males to existing HPV vaccination programs in females.
trial registrationProspective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration CRD42016038965 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.