Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30016917›Full record

Trial reportWomen's health (London, England)

Genotype scores predict drug efficacy in subtypes of female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

Adriaan Tuiten, Frits Michiels, Koen Be Böcker, Daniël Höhle, Jack van Honk, Robert Pj de Lange, Kim van Rooij, Rob Kessels, Jos Bloemers, Jeroen Gerritsen and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Adriaan Tuiten1 Emotional Brain BV, Almere, The Netherlands.
Frits Michiels2 Chemistry and Life Sciences, V.O. Patients & Trademarks, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen Be Böcker3 Alan Turing Institute Almere, Almere, The Netherlands.
Daniël Höhle3 Alan Turing Institute Almere, Almere, The Netherlands.
Jack van Honk4 Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Robert Pj de Lange3 Alan Turing Institute Almere, Almere, The Netherlands.
Kim van Rooij1 Emotional Brain BV, Almere, The Netherlands.
Rob Kessels1 Emotional Brain BV, Almere, The Netherlands.
Jos Bloemers1 Emotional Brain BV, Almere, The Netherlands.
Jeroen Gerritsen1 Emotional Brain BV, Almere, The Netherlands.
Paddy Janssen8 Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leo de Leede10 Exelion Bio-Pharmaceutical Consultancy B.V., Waddinxveen, The Netherlands.
John-Jules Meyer3 Alan Turing Institute Almere, Almere, The Netherlands.
Walter Everaerd12 Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henderik W Frijlink13 Research Group of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherland.
Hans Pf Koppeschaar1 Emotional Brain BV, Almere, The Netherlands.
Berend Olivier7 Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences and Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
James G Pfaus16 Department of Psychology, Centre for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Emotional Brain (Netherlands) · NLUtrecht University · NLConcordia University · CAUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NLYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attempts to develop a drug treatment for female sexual interest/arousal disorder have so far been guided by the principle of 'one size fits all', and have failed to acknowledge the complexity of female sexuality. Guided by personalized medicine, we designed two on-demand drugs targeting two distinct hypothesized causal mechanisms for this sexual disorder. The objective of this study was to design and test a novel procedure, based on genotyping, that predicts which of the two on-demand drugs will yield a positive treatment response. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over experiment, 139 women with female sexual interest/arousal disorder received three different on-demand drug-combination treatments during three 2-week periods: testosterone 0.5 mg + sildenafil 50 mg, testosterone 0.5 mg + buspirone 10 mg, and matching placebo. The primary endpoint was change in satisfactory sexual events. Subjects' genetic profile was assessed using a microarray chip that measures 300,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. A preselection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with genes that are shown to be involved in sexual behaviour were combined into a Phenotype Prediction Score. The Phenotype Prediction Score demarcation formula was developed and subsequently validated on separate data sets. Prediction of drug-responders with the Phenotype Prediction Score demarcation formula gave large effect sizes (d = 0.66 through 1.06) in the true drug-responders, and medium effect sizes (d = 0.51 and d = 0.47) in all patients (including identified double, and non-responders). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Phenotype Prediction Score demarcation formula were all between 0.78 and 0.79, and thus sufficient. The resulting Phenotype Prediction Score was validated and shown to effectively and reliably predict which women would benefit from which on-demand drug, and could therefore also be useful in clinical practice, as a companion diagnostic establishing the way to a true personalized medicine approach.

Indexed as

AdultAndrogensBuspironeCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansLibidoMiddle AgedSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalSildenafil CitrateTestosteroneTreatment OutcomeAndrogensBuspironeSildenafil CitrateTestosteronefemale sexual interest/arousal disordergenotype scoreshypoactive sexual desire disorderpersonalized medicinephenotype prediction scoresatisfactory sexual eventssingle-nucleotide polymorphismstestosterone

Identifiers

PMID30016917
PMCPMC6052493
OpenAlexW2883491365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.