Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30016815›Full record

ArticleMethods of information in medicine2018

Smart Medical Information Technology for Healthcare (SMITH).

Alfred Winter, Sebastian Stäubert, Danny Ammon, Stephan Aiche, Oya Beyan, Verena Bischoff, Philipp Daumke, Stefan Decker, Gert Funkat, Jan E Gewehr and 28 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
30.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Automated sample annotation for diabetes mellitus in healthcare integrated biobanking.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Alfred Winter
Sebastian Stäubert
Danny Ammon
Stephan Aiche
Oya Beyan
Verena Bischoff
Philipp Daumke
Stefan Decker
Gert Funkat
Jan E Gewehr
Armin de Greiff
Silke Haferkamp
Udo Hahn
Andreas Henkel
Toralf Kirsten
Thomas Klöss
Jörg Lippert
Matthias Löbe
Volker Lowitsch
Oliver Maassen
Jens Maschmann
Sven Meister
Rafael Mikolajczyk
Matthias Nüchter
Mathias W Pletz
Erhard Rahm
Morris Riedel
Kutaiba Saleh
Andreas Schuppert
Stefan Smers
André Stollenwerk
Stefan Uhlig
Thomas Wendt
Sven Zenker
Wolfgang Fleig
Gernot Marx
André Scherag
Markus Löffler
Leipzig University · DERWTH Aachen University · DEJena University Hospital · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEAverbis (Germany) · DEBayer (Germany) · DEEssen University Hospital · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DEFraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

Grant No's. 01ZZ1609A, 01ZZ1609B, 01ZZ1609C, 01ZZ1803A, 01ZZ1803B, 01ZZ1803C, 01ZZ1803D, 01ZZ1803E, 01ZZ1803F, 01ZZ1803G, 01ZZ1803H, 01ZZ1803I, 01ZZ1803J, 01ZZ1803K, 01ZZ1803L, 01ZZ1803M, 01ZZ1803N German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on the German Medical Informatics Initiative. "Smart Medical Information Technology for Healthcare (SMITH)" is one of four consortia funded by the German Medical Informatics Initiative (MI-I) to create an alliance of universities, university hospitals, research institutions and IT companies. SMITH's goals are to establish Data Integration Centers (DICs) at each SMITH partner hospital and to implement use cases which demonstrate the usefulness of the approach.

objectivesTo give insight into architectural design issues underlying SMITH data integration and to introduce the use cases to be implemented. GOVERNANCE AND POLICIES: SMITH implements a federated approach as well for its governance structure as for its information system architecture. SMITH has designed a generic concept for its data integration centers. They share identical services and functionalities to take best advantage of the interoperability architectures and of the data use and access process planned. The DICs provide access to the local hospitals' Electronic Medical Records (EMR). This is based on data trustee and privacy management services. DIC staff will curate and amend EMR data in the Health Data Storage. METHODOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURAL FRAMEWORK: To share medical and research data, SMITH's information system is based on communication and storage standards. We use the Reference Model of the Open Archival Information System and will consistently implement profiles of Integrating the Health Care Enterprise (IHE) and Health Level Seven (HL7) standards. Standard terminologies will be applied. The SMITH Market Place will be used for devising agreements on data access and distribution. 3LGM USE CASES: The methodological use case "Phenotype Pipeline" (PheP) constructs algorithms for annotations and analyses of patient-related phenotypes according to classification rules or statistical models based on structured data. Unstructured textual data will be subject to natural language processing to permit integration into the phenotyping algorithms. The clinical use case "Algorithmic Surveillance of ICU Patients" (ASIC) focusses on patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU) with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A model-based decision-support system will give advice for mechanical ventilation. The clinical use case HELP develops a "hospital-wide electronic medical record-based computerized decision support system to improve outcomes of patients with blood-stream infections" (HELP). ASIC and HELP use the PheP. The clinical benefit of the use cases ASIC and HELP will be demonstrated in a change of care clinical trial based on a step wedge design. DISCUSSION: SMITH's strength is the modular, reusable IT architecture based on interoperability standards, the integration of the hospitals' information management departments and the public-private partnership. The project aims at sustainability beyond the first 4-year funding period.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInformation TechnologyAlgorithmsClinical GovernanceCommunicationDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsInformation Storage and RetrievalIntensive Care UnitsModels, TheoreticalPhenotypePolicy

Identifiers

PMID30016815
PMCPMC6193398
OpenAlexW2894794416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.