Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30016540›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2018

Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.

David M Haas, Sarah Morgan, Karenrose Contreras, Savannah Enders

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03925155 phase3withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Trial to Investigate if a Pre-operative Wash With Chlorhexidine vs Povidone-iodine Vaginal Scrub Decreases Infectious Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section After Ruptured Membranes

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2020 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsCesarean Section ComplicationsArmsEZ scrub vaginal chlorhexidine 4% solution, 10% provodine-iodine vaginal preparation
NCT04163679 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Combining Vaginal Preparation and Azithromycin in Reduction of Post Cesarean Infections: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomack Army Medical CenterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled84ConditionsInfection, Obstetric Labor Complications, Endometritis, Cesarean Delivery Affecting FetusArmsVaginal Preparation
NCT04385680 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Chlorhexidine Preoperative Vaginal Preparation in Reducing the Post-cesarean Endometritis and Sepsis for Cases in Labor. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled840ConditionsPostpartum Endometritis, Wound Infection, Chlorhexidine Adverse Reaction, Postoperative FeverArmsChlorhexidine Gluconate vaginal solution 0.05%
NCT04667000 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of Forced Air Warming Used For Different Body Parts During Caseraen Section On Maternal Hypothermia, Shivering, Thermal Comfort, Apgar Score And Breastfeeding: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled35ConditionsCesarean Section Complications, HypothermiaArmsForced Air Warming
NCT05953714 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The effect of using chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine solution on the healing process before a cesarean section

TypeinterventionalSponsorSakarya UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled102ConditionsEvaluate to Effects of Two Antiseptic Products and ShoweringArmsincision side cleaning with antiseptic products
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Periodic Bleeding from a Cesarean Section Scar Fistula.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Management of clinical chorioamnionitis: an evidence-based approach.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M HaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1001 West 10th Street, F-5, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 46202.
Sarah Morgan
Karenrose Contreras
Savannah Enders
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USWomen's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2010 and subsequently updated in 2012, and twice in 2014.

objectivesTo determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications. We also assessed the side effects of vaginal cleansing solutions to determine adverse events associated with the intervention. SEARCH

methodsWe searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (10 July 2017), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized trials and one quasi-randomized trial assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Cluster-randomized trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. We excluded trials that utilized vaginal preparation during labor or that did not use antibiotic surgical prophylaxis. We also excluded any trials using a cross-over design. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least three of the review authors independently assessed eligibility of the studies. Two review authors were assigned to extract study characteristics, quality assessments, and data from eligible studies. MAIN

resultsWe included 11 trials reporting results for 3403 women evaluating the effects of vaginal cleansing (eight using povidone-iodine, two chlorhexidine, one benzalkonium chloride) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Additionally, some trials used vaginal preparations using sponge sticks, douches, or soaked gauze wipes. The control groups were typically no vaginal preparation (eight trials) or the use of a saline vaginal preparation (three trials). The risk of bias in the studies reduced our confidence in the results for endometritis outcomes.Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 8.7% in control groups to 3.8% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.63, 10 trials, 3283 women, moderate quality of evidence). Subgroup analysis could not rule out larger reductions in endometritis with antiseptics in women who were in labor or in women whose membranes had ruptured when antiseptics were used. Risks of postoperative fever and postoperative wound infection may be slightly lowered by antiseptic preparation, but the confidence intervals around the effects for both outcomes are consistent with a large reduction in risk and no difference between groups (fever: RR 0.87 (0.72 to 1.05; wound infection: RR 0.74 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.11), both moderate-quality evidence). Two trials reported a lower risk of a composite outcome of wound complication or endometritis in women receiving preoperative vaginal preparation (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.82, two trials, 499 women, moderate-quality evidence). No adverse effects were reported with either the povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine vaginal cleansing. AUTHORS'

conclusionsVaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine solution compared to saline or not cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis. Subgroup analysis could not rule out larger reductions in endometritis with antiseptics in women who were in labor or in women whose membranes had ruptured when antiseptics were used.The quality of the evidence using GRADE was moderate for all reported outcomes. We downgraded the outcome of post-cesarean endometritis and composite of wound complications or endometritis for risk of bias and postoperative fever and postoperative wound infections for wide CIs.As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers may consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before performing cesarean deliveries.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBenzalkonium CompoundsCesarean SectionChlorhexidineDisinfectionEndometritisFemaleFeverHumansPovidone-IodinePregnancyPreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound InfectionVaginaAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBenzalkonium CompoundsChlorhexidinePovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID30016540
PMCPMC6513039
OpenAlexW4289752559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.