Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30016499›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2018

Brain networks of happiness: dynamic functional connectivity among the default, cognitive and salience networks relates to subjective well-being.

Liang Shi, Jiangzhou Sun, Xinran Wu, Dongtao Wei, Qunlin Chen, Wenjing Yang, Hong Chen, Jiang Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liang ShiKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Jiangzhou SunKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Xinran WuKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Dongtao WeiKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Qunlin ChenKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Wenjing YangKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Hong ChenKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.
Jiang QiuKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjective well-being (SWB) reflects the cognitive and emotional evaluations of an individual's life and plays an important role in individual's success in health, work and social relationships. Although previous studies have revealed the spontaneous brain activity underlying SWB, little is known about the relationship between brain network interactions and SWB. The present study investigated the static and dynamic functional connectivity among large-scale brain networks during resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in relation to SWB in two large independent datasets. The results showed that SWB is negatively correlated with static functional connectivity between the salience network (SN) and the anterior default mode network (DMN). Dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) analysis found that SWB is negatively correlated with the fraction of time that participants spent in a brain state characterized by weak cross-network connectivity (between the DMN, SN and frontal-parietal network [FPN]) and strong within-network connectivity (within the DMN and within the FPN). This connectivity profile may account for the good mental adaptability and flexible information communication of people with high levels of SWB. The dFNC results were well replicated with different analysis parameters and further validated in an independent sample. Taken together, these findings reveal that the dynamic interaction between networks involved in self-reflection, emotional regulation and cognitive control underlies SWB.

Indexed as

HappinessAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingCognitionCommunicationFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysParietal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID30016499
PMCPMC6123521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.