Trial reportPloS one2018
The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Timing of responses to gradual and abrupt visuo-proprioceptive cue conflict with and without feedback.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- The Somatosensory Cortex and Body Representation: Updating the Motor System during a Visuoproprioceptive Cue Conflict.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- The role of explicit knowledge in compensating for a visuo-proprioceptive cue conflict.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Article
- Imprecise perception of hand position during early motor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Effect of visuo-proprioceptive mismatch rate on recalibration in hand perception.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Changes in body perception following virtual object manipulation are accompanied by changes of the internal reference scale.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Visuo-proprioceptive recalibration and the sensorimotor map.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Understanding implicit sensorimotor adaptation as a process of proprioceptive re-alignment.eLife · 2022Article
- Proprioceptive recalibration following implicit visuomotor adaptation is preserved in Parkinson's disease.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Implicit motor learning within three trials.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- External error attribution dampens efferent-based predictions but not proprioceptive changes in hand localization.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The effect of age on visuomotor learning processes.PloS one · 2020Article
- Motor learning without moving: Proprioceptive and predictive hand localization after passive visuoproprioceptive discrepancy training.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adapting reaches to altered visual feedback not only leads to motor changes, but also to shifts in perceived hand location; "proprioceptive recalibration". These changes are robust to many task variations and can occur quite rapidly. For instance, our previous study found both motor and sensory shifts arise in as few as 6 rotated-cursor training trials. The aim of this study is to investigate one of the training signals that contribute to these rapid sensory and motor changes. We do this by removing the visuomotor error signals associated with classic visuomotor rotation training; and provide only experience with a visual-proprioceptive discrepancy for training. While a force channel constrains reach direction 30o away from the target, the cursor representing the hand unerringly moves straight to the target. The resulting visual-proprioceptive discrepancy drives significant and rapid changes in no-cursor reaches and felt hand position, again within only 6 training trials. The extent of the sensory change is unexpectedly larger following the visual-proprioceptive discrepancy training. Not surprisingly the size of the reach aftereffects is substantially smaller than following classic visuomotor rotation training. However, the time course by which both changes emerge is similar in the two training types. These results suggest that even the mere exposure to a discrepancy between felt and seen hand location is a sufficient training signal to drive robust motor and sensory plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.