ArticlePloS one2018
Qualitative study for betel quid cessation among oral cancer patients.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Betel Nut Intervention Trial (BENIT)-A Randomized Clinical Trial for Areca Nut and Betel Quid Cessation: Primary Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Trial
- Periodontitis presenting among betel quid users: A case series.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2025Article
- A Review of Intervention Strategies for Areca Nut Use Cessation.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2023Review
- Vertical Root Fracture in Non-Endodontically and Endodontically Treated Teeth: Current Understanding and Future Challenge.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Areca Nut Chewing: Initiation, Addiction, and Harmful Effects Emphasizing the Barriers and Importance of Cessation.Journal of addiction · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The psychoactive effects of using areca nut and its potential for dependence have been observed. However, the factors that create barriers to or promote chewing cessation are not well understood. This study aims to explore the behavioral changes of betel quid chewers who have been diagnosed with oral cancer within a transtheoretical model framework. Thirty oral cancer patients with betel quid chewing history were chosen for in-depth interviews. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data and identify themes that described the behavioral changes of betel quid cessation. Our research showed that betel quid chewers with oral cancer typically experience four significant stages of behavior: pre-contemplation, contemplation, action, and maintenance. Each stage change was marked by specific characteristics. At first, chewers showed positive attitudes toward the psychoactive or social effects of betel quid. They then realized the negative effects of betel quid, such as dental or other physical problems. Some also realized that they were addicted to betel quid. When they decided to quit, most chewers reported going "cold turkey." Some chewers successfully quit betel quid and attributed it to willpower. Those quitting because of the loss of oral functions were unable to chew anymore, though some chewers had experienced a relapse. In the maintenance stage, ex-chewers reported overcoming their addiction; however, relapse was possible. In this study, those who quit betel quid because of oral cancer usually quit tobacco and alcohol as well, with a lesser chance of recurrence. As the maintenance of chewing betel quid is multifactorial, this study provides information for betel quid cessation and oral cancer prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.