Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30016319›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2018

Nonlinear and delayed impacts of climate on dengue risk in Barbados: A modelling study.

Rachel Lowe, Antonio Gasparrini, Cédric J Van Meerbeeck, Catherine A Lippi, Roché Mahon, Adrian R Trotman, Leslie Rollock, Avery Q J Hinds, Sadie J Ryan, Anna M Stewart-Ibarra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Research Trends and Collaborative Patterns inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Rachel LoweDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-7343
Antonio GasparriniDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-3568
Cédric J Van MeerbeeckCaribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology, St. James, Barbados.
Catherine A LippiQuantitative Disease Ecology and Conservation Lab Group, Department of Geography and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7988-0324
Roché MahonCaribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology, St. James, Barbados.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-7033
Adrian R TrotmanCaribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology, St. James, Barbados.ORCID 0000-0002-3099-8671
Leslie RollockMinistry of Health, St. Michael, Barbados.
Avery Q J HindsCaribbean Public Health Agency, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.
Sadie J RyanQuantitative Disease Ecology and Conservation Lab Group, Department of Geography and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-6321
Anna M Stewart-IbarraInstitute for Global Health and Translational Science, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Florida · USCaribbean Public Health Agency · TTMinistry of Health · BBSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M022625/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last 5 years (2013-2017), the Caribbean region has faced an unprecedented crisis of co-occurring epidemics of febrile illness due to arboviruses transmitted by the Aedes sp. mosquito (dengue, chikungunya, and Zika). Since 2013, the Caribbean island of Barbados has experienced 3 dengue outbreaks, 1 chikungunya outbreak, and 1 Zika fever outbreak. Prior studies have demonstrated that climate variability influences arbovirus transmission and vector population dynamics in the region, indicating the potential to develop public health interventions using climate information. The aim of this study is to quantify the nonlinear and delayed effects of climate indicators, such as drought and extreme rainfall, on dengue risk in Barbados from 1999 to 2016. METHODS AND

findingsDistributed lag nonlinear models (DLNMs) coupled with a hierarchal mixed-model framework were used to understand the exposure-lag-response association between dengue relative risk and key climate indicators, including the standardised precipitation index (SPI) and minimum temperature (Tmin). The model parameters were estimated in a Bayesian framework to produce probabilistic predictions of exceeding an island-specific outbreak threshold. The ability of the model to successfully detect outbreaks was assessed and compared to a baseline model, representative of standard dengue surveillance practice. Drought conditions were found to positively influence dengue relative risk at long lead times of up to 5 months, while excess rainfall increased the risk at shorter lead times between 1 and 2 months. The SPI averaged over a 6-month period (SPI-6), designed to monitor drought and extreme rainfall, better explained variations in dengue risk than monthly precipitation data measured in millimetres. Tmin was found to be a better predictor than mean and maximum temperature. Furthermore, including bidimensional exposure-lag-response functions of these indicators-rather than linear effects for individual lags-more appropriately described the climate-disease associations than traditional modelling approaches. In prediction mode, the model was successfully able to distinguish outbreaks from nonoutbreaks for most years, with an overall proportion of correct predictions (hits and correct rejections) of 86% (81%:91%) compared with 64% (58%:71%) for the baseline model. The ability of the model to predict dengue outbreaks in recent years was complicated by the lack of data on the emergence of new arboviruses, including chikungunya and Zika.

conclusionWe present a modelling approach to infer the risk of dengue outbreaks given the cumulative effect of climate variations in the months leading up to an outbreak. By combining the dengue prediction model with climate indicators, which are routinely monitored and forecasted by the Regional Climate Centre (RCC) at the Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (CIMH), probabilistic dengue outlooks could be included in the Caribbean Health-Climatic Bulletin, issued on a quarterly basis to provide climate-smart decision-making guidance for Caribbean health practitioners. This flexible modelling approach could be extended to model the risk of dengue and other arboviruses in the Caribbean region.

Indexed as

ClimateDisease OutbreaksDisease VectorsWeatherAedesAnimalsBarbadosBayes TheoremDengueDengue VirusDroughtsFloodsHot TemperatureHumansNonlinear DynamicsRain

Identifiers

PMID30016319
PMCPMC6049902
OpenAlexW2885020463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.