ArticleMolecular medicine reports2018
Candidate gene and mechanism investigations in congenital obstructive nephropathy based on bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Transcriptomic Differences between Lower Extremities Arterial Disease, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Chronic Venous Disease in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Specimens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to explore the candidate genes, chemicals and mechanisms of congenital obstructive nephropathy (CON). The gene expression profiles of GSE48041, including 24 kidney tissue samples from megabladder (mgb‑/‑) mouse were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Samples were divided into 4 groups: Control, mild, moderate and severe. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), protein‑protein interaction network, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways and transcription factor (TF)‑target gene analyses were performed on Set 1 (mild, moderate and severe groups), while Gene Ontology (GO) function enrichment analysis and chemical investigation were performed on Set 2 (severe group). A total of 187 and 139 DEGs were obtained in Set 1 and Set 2, respectively. Chemical carcinogenesis [enriched by genes such as Carbonyl reductase 1 (CBR1)] was one of the most prominent pathways in Set 1. GO analysis for Set 2 revealed that DEGs were mainly assembled in functions such as cellular response to interleukin‑1 and cellular response to tumor necrosis. Furthermore, genes such as Fos Proto‑Oncogene (FOS) were co‑regulated by TFs including RNA polymerase II subunit A (Polr2a) and serum response factor (Srf). Chemical cyclosporine served the most important role in Set 2 by targeting several DEGs in Set 2. DEGs such as CBR1 and FOS, TFs including Polr2a and Srf, and pathways such as chemical carcinogenesis may serve important roles in the process of CON. Interleukin‑1 and tumor necrosis function may be novel targets for CON gene therapy. Furthermore, cyclosporine may be a promising option for future CON therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.