Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30015853›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2018

A comprehensive analysis of prognosis prediction models based on pathway‑level, gene‑level and clinical information for glioblastoma.

Ruqing Liang, Meng Wang, Guizhi Zheng, Hua Zhu, Yaqin Zhi, Zongwen Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruqing LiangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272000, P.R. China.
Meng WangDepartment of Oncology, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272011, P.R. China.
Guizhi ZhengCollege of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272067, P.R. China.
Hua ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272011, P.R. China.
Yaqin ZhiDepartment of Oncology, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272011, P.R. China.
Zongwen SunDepartment of Oncology, Jining First People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272011, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop a pathway‑based prognosis prediction model for glioblastoma (GBM). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify prognosis‑related genes and clinical factors using mRNA‑seq data of GBM samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The expression matrix of prognosis‑related genes was transformed into pathway deregulation score (PDS) based on the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) repository using Pathifier software. With PDS scores as input, L1‑penalized estimation‑based Cox‑proportional hazards (PH) model was used to identify prognostic pathways. Consequently, a prognosis prediction model based on these prognostic pathways was constructed for classifying patients in the TCGA set or each of the three validation sets into two risk groups. The survival difference between these risk groups was then analyzed using Kaplan‑Meier survival analysis and log‑rank test. In addition, a gene‑based prognostic model was constructed using the Cox‑PH model. The model of prognostic pathway combined with clinical factors was also evaluated. In total, 148 genes were discovered to be associated with prognosis. The Cox‑PH model identified 13 prognostic pathways. Subsequently, a prognostic model based on the 13 pathways was constructed, and was demonstrated to successfully differentiate overall survival in the TCGA set and in three independent sets. However, the gene‑based prognosis model was validated in only two of the three independent sets. Furthermore, the pathway+clinic factor‑based model exhibited better predictive results compared with the pathway‑based model. In conclusion, the present study suggests a promising prognosis prediction model of 13 pathways for GBM, which may be superior to the gene‑level information‑based prognostic model.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaNeoplasm ProteinsAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30015853
PMCPMC6108889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.