ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2018
A comprehensive analysis of prognosis prediction models based on pathway‑level, gene‑level and clinical information for glioblastoma.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients-are we there yet? A systematic review of prognostic modeling for glioblastoma and its clinical potential.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Construct prognostic models of multiple myeloma with pathway information incorporated.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Construction of an immune-related gene signature for the prognosis and diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- FN1 overexpression is correlated with unfavorable prognosis and immune infiltrates in breast cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Identification of C3 and FN1 as potential biomarkers associated with progression and prognosis for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis to identify a candidate prognostic biomarker for ovarian cancer.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Identification of a prognostic gene signature of colon cancer using integrated bioinformatics analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- A potential prognostic model based on miRNA expression profile in The Cancer Genome Atlas for bladder cancer patients.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2020Article
- Molecular subtyping of glioblastoma based on immune-related genes for prognosis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comparison of pathway and gene-level models for cancer prognosis prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A Potential Prognostic Gene Signature for Predicting Survival for Glioblastoma Patients.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to develop a pathway‑based prognosis prediction model for glioblastoma (GBM). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify prognosis‑related genes and clinical factors using mRNA‑seq data of GBM samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The expression matrix of prognosis‑related genes was transformed into pathway deregulation score (PDS) based on the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) repository using Pathifier software. With PDS scores as input, L1‑penalized estimation‑based Cox‑proportional hazards (PH) model was used to identify prognostic pathways. Consequently, a prognosis prediction model based on these prognostic pathways was constructed for classifying patients in the TCGA set or each of the three validation sets into two risk groups. The survival difference between these risk groups was then analyzed using Kaplan‑Meier survival analysis and log‑rank test. In addition, a gene‑based prognostic model was constructed using the Cox‑PH model. The model of prognostic pathway combined with clinical factors was also evaluated. In total, 148 genes were discovered to be associated with prognosis. The Cox‑PH model identified 13 prognostic pathways. Subsequently, a prognostic model based on the 13 pathways was constructed, and was demonstrated to successfully differentiate overall survival in the TCGA set and in three independent sets. However, the gene‑based prognosis model was validated in only two of the three independent sets. Furthermore, the pathway+clinic factor‑based model exhibited better predictive results compared with the pathway‑based model. In conclusion, the present study suggests a promising prognosis prediction model of 13 pathways for GBM, which may be superior to the gene‑level information‑based prognostic model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.