Observational studyMedical care2018
Does Providing Positive Airway Pressure for Sleep Apnea Change Health Care Utilization?
Observational study in Medical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use and limitations of databases and big data in sleep-disordered breathing research.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
- Association of Positive Airway Pressure Use With Acute Care Utilization and Costs.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- Failure of PAP Therapy to Alter the Trajectory of Health Care Utilization Among Patients With OSA: A Wake-up Call for the Field of Sleep Medicine or Just a Bad Dream?Medical care · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep apnea is underdiagnosed and thus undertreated. If therapy for sleep apnea results in reduced health care utilization in an entire treated population, then decision-makers will have key information for allocating limited health care resources.
objectivesTo determine whether positive airway pressure (PAP) for sleep apnea was associated with reduced health care utilization in an entire treated population. RESEARCH
designThis was a retrospective cohort; propensity score-matched cases and noncases; pre-post analyses of individual subject utilization. SUBJECTS: Electronic health records were used to identify adult subjects diagnosed with sleep apnea and dispensed PAP therapy (cases) and those without either diagnosed sleep apnea or dispensed PAP therapy (noncases). MEASURES: Acute care hospital days and dispensed medication days supply were compared in cases and noncases. Negative binomial regression was used to model utilization for up to 5 years before and 7 years after PAP dispensation (cases) or a random date (noncases). The association of PAP with changing annual utilization was estimated.
resultsThere were 13,271 cases and 13,271 matched noncases from 2008 to 2012 for analyses. Trends in the annual rate of acute care utilization were no different between cases and noncases (rate ratio, 0.98, P=0.543). Trends in the annual rate of medication utilization were no different between cases and noncases (rate ratio, 1.008, P=0.112).
conclusionsPAP dispensation for sleep apnea did not appear to reduce the rate of acute care and medication utilization over several years of follow-up in a large integrated health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.