Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30015701›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2019

Prospective Validation of Prediction Model for Kidney Discard.

Sheng Zhou, Allan B Massie, Courtenay M Holscher, Madeleine M Waldram, Tanveen Ishaque, Alvin G Thomas, Dorry L Segev

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deceased donor kidneys from higher distressed communities are significantly less likely to be utilized for transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends over Time in Practice and Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in Recipients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sheng ZhouDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Allan B MassieDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Courtenay M HolscherDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Madeleine M WaldramDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Tanveen IshaqueDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Alvin G ThomasDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Dorry L SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Patient Oriented Research in Solid Organ TransplantationK24AI144954 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2020 to 2024
$956k
Patient Oriented Research in Kidney Disease and Transplant SurgeryK24DK101828 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2014 to 2018
$922k
Trajectory of post-donation renal function in living kidney donorsF32DK109662 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOLSCHER, COURTENAY · 2016 to 2018
$232k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI144954NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK109662NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK101828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany kidneys are discarded every year, with 3631 kidneys discarded in 2016 alone. Identifying kidneys at high risk of discard could facilitate "rescue" allocation to centers more likely to transplant them. The Probability of Delay or Discard (PODD) model was developed to identify marginal kidneys at risk of discard or delayed allocation beyond 36 hours of cold ischemia time. However, PODD has not been prospectively validated, and patterns of discard may have changed after policy changes such as the introduction of Kidney Donor Profile Index and implementation of the Kidney Allocation System (KAS).

methodsWe prospectively validated the PODD model using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data in the KAS era (January 1, 2015, to March 1, 2018). C statistic was calculated to assess accuracy in predicting kidney discard. We assessed clustering in centers' utilization of kidneys with PODD >0.6 ("high-PODD") using Gini coefficients. Using match run data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016, we examined distribution of these high-PODD kidneys offered to centers that never accepted a high-PODD kidney.

resultsThe PODD model predicted discard accurately under KAS (C-statistic, 0.87). Compared with utilization of low-PODD kidneys (Gini coefficient = 0.41), utilization of high-PODD kidneys was clustered more tightly among a few centers (Gini coefficient, 0.84 with >60% of centers never transplanted a high-PODD kidneys). In total, 11684 offers (35.0% of all high-PODD offers) were made to centers that never accepted a high-PODD kidney.

conclusionsPrioritizing allocation of high-PODD kidneys to centers that are more likely to transplant them might help reduce kidney discard.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30015701
PMCPMC6330256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.