Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30015533›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Examination of the New Short-Stay Nursing Home Quality Measures: Rehospitalizations, Emergency Department Visits, and Successful Returns to the Community.

Debra Saliba, David L Weimer, Yuxi Shi, Dana B Mukamel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. What's in a Number: Do Transfer Rates Reflect Nursing Home Quality?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Public Reporting on long-term Care Facilities in Germany: Current State and Evaluation of Quality Information].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Debra Saliba1 UCLA Borun Center at David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David L Weimer4 University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Yuxi Shi5 University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Dana B Mukamel5 University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-5785

Funding

Statistical Data Enclave CoreP30AG017266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Michal Engelman · 1999 to 2026
$17.0M
Improving quality report cards through inclusion of consumers preferencesR01AG049705 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MUKAMEL, DANA B · 2016 to 2018
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017266NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced 3 new quality measures (QMs) to its report card, Nursing Home Compare (NHC). These measures-rehospitalizations, emergency department visits, and successful discharges to the community-focus on short-stay residents. We offer a first analysis of nursing homes' performance in terms of these new measures. We examined their properties and distribution across nursing homes using descriptive statistics and regression models. We found that, similar to other QMs, performance varies across the country, and that there is very minimal correlation between these 3 new QMs as well as between these QMs and other NHC QMs. Regression models reveal that better performance on these QMs tends to be associated with fewer deficiencies, higher staffing and more skilled staffing, nonprofit ownership, and lower proportion of Medicaid residents. Other characteristics are associated with better performance for some but not all 3 QMs. We also found improvement in all 3 QMs in the second year of publication. This study contributes to the validity of these measures by demonstrating their relationship to these structural QMs. It also suggests that these QMs are important by demonstrating their large variation across the country, suggesting substantial room for improvement, and finding that nursing homes are already responding to the incentives created by publication of these QMs.

Indexed as

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Emergency Service, HospitalHumansLength of StayMedicaidMedicareNursing HomesPatient ReadmissionQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareTime FactorsUnited Statesemergency departmentMedicarenursing homespolicypostacute carequalityrehospitalizationreport cards

Identifiers

PMID30015533
PMCPMC6050817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.