Observational studyESC heart failure2018
Systemic inflammation in acute cardiorenal syndrome: an observational pilot study.
Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges of Biomarker Application in Patients with Cardiorenal Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A predictive model for the risk of death within 30 days in patients with cardiorenal syndrome treated with continuous renal replacement therapy: A retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic biomarker in patients hospitalized for cardiorenal syndrome.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Observational
- Novel Perspectives in Chronic Kidney Disease-Specific Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Molecular imaging along the heart-kidney axis.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Cardiorenal Syndrome: An Updated Classification Based on Clinical Hallmarks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Beyond the Cardiorenal Syndrome: Pathophysiological Approaches and Biomarkers for Renal and Cardiac Crosstalk.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Molecular imaging of inflammation crosstalk along the cardio-renal axis following acute myocardial infarction.Theranostics · 2021Article
- Insights of Worsening Renal Function in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome: From the Pathogenesis, Biomarkers to Treatment.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Diabetes prevalence and outcomes in hospitalized cardiorenal-syndrome patients with and without hyponatremia.BMC nephrology · 2020Article
- Systemic inflammation in acute cardiorenal syndrome: an observational pilot study.ESC heart failure · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAcute cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) with and without consideration of the volume state was assessed with regard to inflammatory parameters. METHODS AND
resultsBlood samples from patients with acute CRS (Ronco type 1 or 3, Group 1, n = 15), end-stage renal disease (Group 2, n = 12), hypertension (Group 3, n = 15), and, in a second cohort, with acute CRS and hypervolemia (Group 4, n = 9) and hypertension (Group 5, n = 10) were analysed with regard to lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), interleukins (ILs), and monocyte function (flow cytometry) both on admission (all groups) and on discharge (Groups 1 and 4). By discharge, one Group 1 patient died. LBP (ANOVA for Groups 1-3: P = 0.001) and IL-6 (Kruskal-Wallis for Groups 1-3: P < 0.0001) were higher in Group 1 (LBP: 11.7 ± 2.0 μg/mL; IL-6: 15.0 ± 6.1 pg/mL) and in Group 2 (LBP: 10.4 ± 1.4 μg/mL; IL-6: 14.6 ± 3.8 pg/mL) than in Group 3 (LBP: 5.8 ± 0.4 μg/mL; IL-6: 1.8 ± 0.4 pg/mL). In a direct comparison, the proportion of activated monocytes (CD14 and CD16 positive) was higher in Group 1 (6.9% ± 0.7%) vs. Group 3 (5.1% ± 0.6%; P = 0.018). Group 4 patients had higher IL-6 plasma levels (34.2 ± 10.1 pg/mL) than Group 1 patients (15.0 ± 6.1 pg/mL; P = 0.03). All other findings obtained in CRS groups (Groups 1 and 4) were comparable.
conclusionsIn acute CRS, a state of systemic inflammation was found, which is comparable with the end-stage renal disease situation. In comparison with hypertensive controls, a monocytic activation was found in acute CRS regardless of volume state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.