ArticleImmunology2018
T-cell subset differentiation and antibody responses following antiretroviral therapy during simian immunodeficiency virus infection.
Article in Immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of HIV/acquired immune-deficiency syndrome. However, it remains unclear how ART influences virus-specific immune responses and understanding this is important for developing novel cure and eradication interventions for HIV-1. In the present study, we evaluate how ART impacts T-cell and antibody responses in simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) -infected rhesus macaques. We evaluated CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses by multiparameter flow cytometry, viral loads by quantitative RT-PCR by a two-step process using SIV-specific primers and antibody neutralization function by luciferase-based TZM-bl assays. We demonstrate that macaques treated with ART exhibit phenotypic and qualitative effects on T-cell and antibody responses. Macaques on ART exhibited low numbers of virus-specific T-cell responses, and these responses appeared to be partially biased towards central memory subsets. More importantly, there were significantly reduced neutralizing antibody responses in macaques treated with ART. Collectively, these data improve the understanding of how virus-specific immune responses are generated during ART, and suggest the potential importance of therapeutic vaccines to maintain adaptive immunity during treated infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.