Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30014461›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2018

Extensive somatosensory and motor corticospinal sprouting occurs following a central dorsal column lesion in monkeys.

Karen M Fisher, Alayna Lilak, Joseph Garner, Corinna Darian-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chronic Adaptations in the Dorsal Horn Following a Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reorganization of the Primate Dorsal Horn in Response to a Deafferentation Lesion Affecting Hand Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen M FisherDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Alayna LilakDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Joseph GarnerDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Corinna Darian-SmithDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-4574

Funding

Neuronal and behavioral responses to spinal cord injuryR01NS091031 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DARIAN-SMITH, CORINNA · 2015 to 2024
$6.3M
Hand Use and Neuronal Plasticity After Dorsal RhizotomyR01NS048425 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DARIAN-SMITH, CORINNA · 2004 to 2012
$3.5M
Hand use and neuronal plasticity after spinal cord injuryR56NS048425 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DARIAN-SMITH, CORINNA · 2008 to 2013
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048425NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091031NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS048425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corticospinal tract (CST) forms the major descending pathway mediating voluntary hand movements in primates, and originates from ∼nine cortical subdivisions in the macaque. While the terminals of spared motor CST axons are known to sprout locally within the cord in response to spinal injury, little is known about the response of the other CST subcomponents. We previously reported that following a cervical dorsal root lesion (DRL), the primary somatosensory (S1) CST terminal projection retracts to 60% of its original terminal domain, while the primary motor (M1) projection remains robust (Darian-Smith et al., J. Neurosci., 2013). In contrast, when a dorsal column lesion (DCL) is added to the DRL, the S1 CST, in addition to the M1 CST, extends its terminal projections bilaterally and caudally, well beyond normal range (Darian-Smith et al., J. Neurosci., 2014). Are these dramatic responses linked entirely to the inclusion of a CNS injury (i.e., DCL), or do the two components summate or interact? We addressed this directly, by comparing data from monkeys that received a unilateral DCL alone, with those that received either a DRL or a combined DRL/DCL. Approximately 4 months post-lesion, the S1 hand region was mapped electrophysiologically, and anterograde tracers were injected bilaterally into the region deprived of normal input, to assess spinal terminal labeling. Using multifactorial analyses, we show that following a DCL alone (i.e., cuneate fasciculus lesion), the S1 and M1 CSTs also sprout significantly and bilaterally beyond normal range, with a termination pattern suggesting some interaction between the peripheral and central lesions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrain MappingGray MatterHandHand StrengthMacaca fascicularisMaleMotor CortexMotor Skills DisordersPyramidal TractsRecovery of FunctionSomatosensory CortexSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Nerve RootsTouchcorticospinal tractdorsal columnfunctional recoverymotornonhuman primateprimary afferent lesionRRID: AB_2313606RRID: AB_2536190somatosensoryspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID30014461
PMCPMC6366862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.