Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30014451›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2018

[Basics and applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in radiology].

F Jungmann, S Kuhn, B Kämpgen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F JungmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. florian.jungmann@unimedizin-mainz.de.
S KuhnZentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
B KämpgenEmpolis Information Management GmbH, Technologiepark Würzburg-Rimpar, 97222, Rimpar, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the increasing demands in radiology, applications that enable quality assurance and continuous process optimization are required.

objectiveThe principles of Natural Language Processing (NLP) as a computer-based method for structuring of free text reports are explained and application scenarios are sketched. MATERIALS UND

methodsThe structuring of free texts succeeds by several theories, linguistic techniques (word meanings, word context, negations), statistical methods with rules and currently with deep learning approaches. Medical encyclopedias, such as RadLex®, are suitable for coding findings. NLP was used in our own radiology clinic to check the quality of 3756 CT reports.

resultsIn our case study, NLP proved to be a helpful, automated tool for internal quality testing. DISCUSSION: NLP offers numerous application scenarios for decision support and for quality management in radiology.

Indexed as

RadiologyRadiology Information SystemsNatural Language ProcessingRadiographyArtificial intelligenceDecision supportQuality managementRadiology report narrativeRadlex

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.