Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30014436›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2018

[Recognition and correct classification of pressure ulcers: a position paper].

J Kottner, K Kröger, V Gerber, G Schröder, J Dissemond

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Eczema of wound surroundings : Genesis, diagnostics and treatment].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2023
    Article
  2. [Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a position paper].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J KottnerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
K KrögerKlinik für Angiologie, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Deutschland.
V GerberInitative Chronische Wunden e. V., Quedlinburg, Deutschland.
G SchröderAkademie für Wundversorgung, Göttingen, Deutschland.
J DissemondKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. joachim.dissemond@uk-essen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPressure ulcers comprise serious skin and tissue damage. The correct diagnosis and classification into different categories is often difficult in daily practice. QUESTION: What procedure can be recommended to correctly diagnose and classify pressure ulcers in practice? MATERIALS AND

methodsThe society Initiative Chronische Wunden (ICW) e. V. established a group of experts who developed practical recommendations for the diagnosis and classification of pressure ulcers based on the current literature and their own expertise.

resultsPressure ulcers should only be diagnosed if skin and/or tissue damage is most likely due to prolonged pressure or pressure associated with shear forces. A complete anamnesis must be performed to detect periods of previous prolonged immobility. Pressure ulcers are usually located at typical predilection sites. For category I and "suspected deep tissue damage" the tissue damage occurs under (initially) intact skin. However, the diagnosis is uncertain and the classification should be made later. The category II pressure ulcer is usually an exclusion diagnosis. The categories III and IV are pressure ulcers in the proper sense. As long as the distinction between category III and IV is not possible, the lower category should be coded.

conclusionsCurrently, a relevant classification should be used uniformly for the respective setting. In accordance with the clinical picture, a most suitable diagnosis is to be made. It does not matter which classification system is used. The future WHO ICD-11 version will allow better classification of pressure ulcers.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerHumansSkinClassificationDiagnosisSkinUlcerWound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.