Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30014347›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2018

Visual Fixation Assessment in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness Based on Brain-Computer Interface.

Jun Xiao, Jiahui Pan, Yanbin He, Qiuyou Xie, Tianyou Yu, Haiyun Huang, Wei Lv, Jiechun Zhang, Ronghao Yu, Yuanqing Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Eye movements as indicators of awareness in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a scoping review of behavioral and neural evidence.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun XiaoCenter for Brain Computer Interfaces and Brain Information Processing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Jiahui PanCenter for Brain Computer Interfaces and Brain Information Processing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Yanbin HeComa Research Group, Centre for Hyperbaric Oxygen and Neurorehabilitation, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, 510010, China.
Qiuyou XieComa Research Group, Centre for Hyperbaric Oxygen and Neurorehabilitation, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, 510010, China.
Tianyou YuCenter for Brain Computer Interfaces and Brain Information Processing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Haiyun HuangCenter for Brain Computer Interfaces and Brain Information Processing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Wei LvComa Research Group, Centre for Hyperbaric Oxygen and Neurorehabilitation, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, 510010, China.
Jiechun ZhangComa Research Group, Centre for Hyperbaric Oxygen and Neurorehabilitation, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, 510010, China.
Ronghao YuComa Research Group, Centre for Hyperbaric Oxygen and Neurorehabilitation, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, 510010, China. gesund@21cn.com.
Yuanqing LiCenter for Brain Computer Interfaces and Brain Information Processing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China. auyqli@scut.edu.cn.
General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual fixation is an item in the visual function subscale of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Sometimes clinicians using the behavioral scales find it difficult to detect because of the motor impairment in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOCs). Brain-computer interface (BCI) can be used to improve clinical assessment because it directly detects the brain response to an external stimulus in the absence of behavioral expression. In this study, we designed a BCI system to assist the visual fixation assessment of DOC patients. The results from 15 patients indicated that three showed visual fixation in both CRS-R and BCI assessments and one did not show such behavior in the CRS-R assessment but achieved significant online accuracy in the BCI assessment. The results revealed that electroencephalography-based BCI can detect the brain response for visual fixation. Therefore, the proposed BCI may provide a promising method for assisting behavioral assessment using the CRS-R.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectroencephalographyFixation, OcularAdolescentAdultAgedBrainConsciousness DisordersEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationPilot ProjectsBrain-computer interfaceComa recovery scale-revisedDisorder of consciousnessElectroencephalographyVisual fixation

Identifiers

PMID30014347
PMCPMC6060219
OpenAlexW2883542286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.