ArticlePediatric surgery international2018
Surgical jejunostomy and radiological gastro-jejunostomy tube feeding in children: risks, benefits and nutritional outcomes.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intussusception around jejunal feeding tubes in pediatric patients: a retrospective two-center experience and management strategies.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- A simplified technique for laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy and its outcomes.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025Article
- Gastrojejunal (GJ) tube feeding: developing a service and evaluating associated complications in a paediatric surgical centre.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Long-term outcomes following failure of Nissen fundoplication.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Therapeutic Efficacy of Nasoenteric Tube Feeding in Children Needing Enteral Nutrition.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiologically inserted gastrojejunal tubes (RGJ) and surgical jejunostomy (SJ) are established modes of jejunal feeding. The aim of the study is to review nutritional outcomes, complications and the practical consideration to enable patients and carers to make informed choice.
methodsRetrospective review of patient notes with a RGJ or SJ in 2010, with detailed follow-up and review of the literature.
resultsBoth RGJ and SJ are reliable modes to provide stable enteral nutrition. Both have complications and their own associated limitations.
conclusionsThe choice has to be tailored to the individual patient, the social care available, the inherent medical disease and risk/benefit of repeated anaesthetic and radiation exposure. RGJ and SJ are important tools for nutritional management that achieve and maintain growth in a complex group of children. The risk and benefits should be reviewed for each individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.